Latest ArticlesRandomisation, controll and blinding are classic designs for drug clinical trials. This article introduced the classification and implementation of blinding, and the particularity of blinding in traditional Chinese medicine clinical trials. Then discussed some concerns about design and implementation of blinding in traditional Chinese medicine clinical trials, such as, should pay attention to the similarity evaluation of placebo, and should design the protocol and process based on the similarity of the placebo, and some problems about the blinding in the dose-finding trails and the packaging and label of investigational product.
In the field of drug development and regulatory science, real-world evidence (RWE) has progressively emerged as a pivotal component. The United States enacted "the 21st Century Cures Act" in December 2016 to encourage Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to leverage real-world evidence, while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has advanced the development and utilization of RWE through relevant initiatives. In January 2020, China issued the "Guideline on the Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Drug Development and Review," which has significantly catalyzed the advancement of this domain domestically. This paper examines 3 specific cases encompassing retrospective observational studies, prospective randomized controlled trials, and retrospective cohort studies. It systematically analyzes their respective designs and outcomes, delves into the critical statistical elements involved, and provides detailed insights into the associated statistic considerations. Overall, while real-world research is applicable to a wide range of study objectives and designs and plays a vital role in scenarios where randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are challenging to implement, it is also constrained by issues such as variable data quality, potential biases and inadequate standardization. In light of these challenges, the paper underscores the necessity for real-world research to integrate rigorous study design, robust data governance, and advanced statistical methodologies to ensure the scientific reliability and validity of the findings. Particular emphasis is placed on bias control during the design phase, the importance of suitability assessments in data governance, and the centrality of causal inference in statistical analysis. Additionally, it recommends that key statistical issues be carefully considered during protocol development and that alignment be achieved with the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) to facilitate the generation of high-quality, evidence-based regulatory decisions.
To investigate and analyze the current state of professional training for clinical research coordinators (CRCs), explore the differences in CRC cultivation between clinical trial institutions and site management organizations (SMOs), and provide references for optimizing the CRC training system.
A total of 613 active CRCs was conducted using convenience sampling method and quota sampling method. The questionnaire includes basic information, induction teaching methods, training frequency, training content, training satisfaction and training needs, etc. Data were collected by the ‘questionnaire star’, statistically analyzed using SAS 9.3 software, and differences were compared using the chi-square test.
There were significant differences between institutions and SMO companies in the education, professional background and working years of CRC (All P<0.05). Institutional CRC generally has a higher degree and more nursing background, while SMO company CRC contains a certain proportion of people with non-medical background. In terms of training, institutional CRC prefers moderate frequency training (6 to 12 times per year), while SMO CRC prefers more frequent high frequency training (more than 12 times per year). SMO company has a high utilization rate of online training, and institutional CRC has some deficiencies in communication skills training. Overall, the CRC is relatively satisfied with the existing training system.
Institutions and SMO companies should develop reasonable training plans according to their own characteristics and reduce unnecessary training burden to improve the work efficiency and clinical trial quality of CRC. It is recommended to adopt more offline training forms, and to conduct targeted training according to the individual needs of CRC.
To observe clinical curative effect and safety of intravenous drip and aerosol inhalation of colistimethate sodium for injection in patients with severe neurological disease and Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) pulmonary infection.
According to queuing method, patients with severe neurological disease and AB pulmonary infection in the hospital were divided into treatment group and control group. Control group was treated with colistimethate sodium for injection (150 mg bid, intravenous drip), while treatment group was treated with colistimethate sodium for injection (75 mg bid, aerosol inhalation) on basis of control group. All patients were treated for 5 days. The clinical curative effect, renal function, inflammatory response, bacterial clearance rates and prognosis in the two groups were compared, and the safety was evaluated.
Among the 80 patients, there were 40 cases in treatment group and 40 cases in control group. After treatment, total response rates of treatment group and control group were 72.50% (29 cases/40 cases) and 42.50% (17 cases/40 cases), levels of serum interleukin-8 were (4.07±1.01) and (5.01±1.65) pg·mL-1, procalcitonin levels were 0.90(0.60, 1.35) and 1.50(1.05, 2.00) ng·mL-1, C-reactive protein levels were (5.57±3.28) and (10.57±6.09) mg·L-1, bacterial clearance rates were 60.00% (24 cases/40 cases) and 35.00% (14 cases/40 cases), and infection-related 28 d mortality rates were 5.00% (2 cases/40 cases) and 20.00% (8 cases/40 cases), the differences between the two groups were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). After treatment, levels of serum creatinine in treatment group and control group were (86.22±9.84) and (87.27±10.54) μmol·L-1, and levels of blood urea nitrogen were (7.98±2.44) and (7.86±2.47) mmol·L-1, the differences were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). The main adverse drug reactions in treatment group were rash, diarrhea and respiratory depression, while which in control group were rash and diarrhea. The difference in total incidence of adverse drug reactions between treatment group and control group was statistically significant (7.50% vs 5.00%, P>0.05).
Curative effect of intravenous drip combined with aerosol inhalation of polymyxin E is significant in patients with severe neurological disease and AB infection, which can effectively increase bacterial clearance rate, reduce inflammatory response and mortality, and will not increase renal injury.
To observe the efficaly and safety of combination regimen of anlotinib with pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).
Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with acquired TKI resistance were divided into control group and treatment group according to the treatment methods. Patients in the control group received intravenous infusions of pemetrexed disodium for injection (500 mg·m-2) and carboplatin injection (dose cauculated based on area under the blood concentration-time curve 6 g·L-1·min-1) on the first day of each treatment cycle, with each 3 weeks as one cycle. On the basis of the control group, the treatment group was given anlotinib hydrochloride capsules, which were taken 10 mg orally continuously for 2 weeks starting from day 1 of each cycle, followed by a 1-week drug holiday. Each 3-week period constituted one treatment cycle. Both groups were continuously treated for 4 cycles or more. The therapeutic outcomes, tumor marker concentrations, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels, immune function, safety evaluation, and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups.
A total of 102 cases were enrolled; there were 48 cases in control group and 54 cases in treatment group. Disease control rate of control group and treatment group were 64.58% (31 cases/48 cases) and 83.33% (45 cases/54 cases), respectively; the carbohydrate antigen 125 levels were (52.38±7.21) and (48.49±6.12) U·mL-1, respectively; the carcinoembryonic antigen levels were (8.29±1.79) and (7.52±1.21) μg·L-1, respectively; the neuron-specific enolase levels were (26.17±4.33) and (23.84±3.32) μg·L-1, respectively; the VEGF-A levels were (95.38±10.76) and (89.47±11.32) pg·mL-1, respectively; the VEGF-B levels were (87.41±9.76) and (82.63±8.13) pg·mL-1, respectively; and the VEGF-C levels were (61.56±7.49) and (58.67±6.20) pg·mL-1, respectively. Comparison of all measured parameters in the treatment group and control group demonstrated statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Adverse event rate of control group and treatment group were 37.50% (18 cases/48 cases) and 42.59% (23 cases/54 cases) respectively; median progression-free survival were 16 and 21 months, respectively; overall survival were 22 and 34 months, respectively; compared between 2 groups, the differences of the above indicators were not statistically significant (all P>0.05).
The addition of anlotinib to pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with TKI-acquired resistant advanced lung adenocarcinoma significantly enhances the efficacy and immunomodulation, and inhibits the tumor growth at the same time, with a good safety profile and long-term efficacy.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of siponimod tablets in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) through a case series study.
Patients meeting inclusion criteria from the department of neurology were enrolled. Demographic data, disease characteristics, medication history and laboratory/imaging results were collected. Efficacy was assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after siponimod tablets medication using 3 dimensions: the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and disease activity. Safety was concurrently evaluated.
A total of 7 patients were included. After 6 months of siponimod tablets treatment, median EDSS score decreased from 7.00 to 6.50; EQ-5D-5L utility index median increased from -0.06 to 0.20; EQ-5D-5L VAS median score rose from 52.86 to 63.57; MSIS-29v2 physical mean score decreased from 64.52 to 54.52; MSIS-29v2 psychological mean score declined from 51.85 to 44.44; MSWS-12 mean score reduced from 80.06 to 75.00. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results indicated decreased disease activity, which was also observed in patients converting from teriflunomide to siponimod treatment. Adverse drug reactions including lymphopenia (2 cases), elevated transaminases (1 case) and hypertension (1 case) were all considered treatment-related.
Siponimod tablets may be a therapeutic option for RMS patients, though larger studies are needed to confirm efficacy. Pre-treatment assessment of complete blood count and liver function is essential. If clinically significant adverse drug reactions occur during the treatment period, adjustments to the dosage or combined medication should be considered.
To explore the the clincial efficacy and safety of butylphthalide soft capsules combined with dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) in the treatment of non-disabling ischemic cerebrovascular events (NICE).
The patients with NICE admitted to the hospital were enrolled as the research objects. According to random number table method, they were divided into treatment group and control group. Control group was treated with DAPT (aspirin enteric-coated tablets 100 mg·d-1+ clopidogrel bisulfate tablets 75 mg·d-1), while treatment group was treated with butylphthalide soft capsules 0.6 g·d-1 on basis of control group for 1 month. The clinical curative effect, incidence of recurrent cerebral infarction within 6 months of follow-up, levels of NLR family Pyrin domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, homocysteine (Hcy) and interleukin (IL)-6, plasma viscosity, whole blood high-shear viscosity, low-shear viscosity and hematocrit were compared between the two groups, and the safety was evaluated.
Among the 130 patients in this study, there were 120 cases included finally after excluding 10 cases not meeting the inclusion criteria. According to random number table method, they were divided into treatment group and control group, and there was no case lost to follow-up in the study process. After treatment, total response rate in treatment group was 93.33% (56 cases /60 cases) which was statistically significantly higher than that in control group [80.00% (48 cases /60 cases), P<0.05]. After treatment, scores of National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) in treatment group and control group were (1.10±0.12) and (1.85±0.21) points, scores of modified Rankin scale (mRS) were (1.10±0.12) and (1.82±0.19) points, scores of activity of daily living (ADL) were (68.97±6.96) and (60.11±6.12) points, levels of NLRP3 inflammasome were (1.40±0.16) and (1.96±0.21) μg·L-1, IL-6 levels were (24.15±2.57) and (31.27±3.35) pg·mL-1, Hcy levels were (20.18±2.13) and (27.78±3.14) μmol·L-1, plasma viscosity were (1.59±0.16) and (1.81±0.19) mPa·s-1, whole blood high-shear viscosity were (4.01±0.41) and (4.78±0.50) mPa·s-1, whole blood low-shear viscosity were (10.42±1.15) and (11.87±1.20) mPa·s-1, and hematocrit were (0.25±0.03) and (0.33±0.04) L·L-1, there were statistically significant differences in the above indexes between the two groups (all P<0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, incidence of recurrent cerebral infarction in treatment group was 8.33% (5 cases /60 cases) which was statistically significantly lower than that in control group [23.33% (14 cases / 60 cases), P<0.05]. The main adverse drug reactions in treatment group were subcutaneous ecchymosis 1 case (1.67%), nausea 1 case (1.67%) and gastrointestinal discomfort 3 cases (5.00%), while which in control group were subcutaneous ecchymosis 2 cases (3.33%), nausea 2 cases (3.33%), vomiting 1 case (1.67%) and gastrointestinal discomfort 2 cases (3.33%). There was no significant difference in total incidence of adverse drug reactions between treatment group and control group (8.33% vs 11.67%, P>0.05).
Curative effect of butylphthalide soft capsule combined with DAPT is good in NICE patients, which can reduce level of NLRP3 inflammasome, improve blood circulation, reduce incidence of recurrent cerebral infarction and will not increase adverse drug reactions.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of oliceridine injection, a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, compared with sufentanil injection, a traditional μ-opioid receptor agonist, during the perioperative period of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
A toal of 80 elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures scheduled for PFNA internal fixation from April 2024 to April 2025 were randomly divided into control group and treatment group. In the control group, sufentanil injection 0.3 μg·kg-1 was used for intraoperative induction, and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after surgery consisted of sufentanil injection 1 μg·kg-1 plus flurbiprofen axetil injection 200 mg. In the treatment group, oliceridine injection 0.06 mg·kg-1 was used for intraoperative induction, and postoperative PCIA consisted of oliceridine injection 0.2 mg·kg-1 plus flurbiprofen axetil injection 200 mg. The time to first ambulation after surgery,15-item Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15) scores at 24 and 48 h after surgery, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery and adverse drug reactions were compared between two groups.
Forty patients were enrolled in each group. For the primary outcome measures, the QoR-15 scores at 24 hours after surgery (T7) in the treatment group and the control group were (123.23±8.82) and (114.80±10.55) scores, respectively; the QoR-15 scores at 48 hours after surgery (T8) were (126.65±6.13) and (118.20±9.13) scores, respectively; the time to first ambulation after surgery were (43.53±4.44) and (46.83±4.13) hours, respectively. The differencs of above indexes between two groups were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). For the secondary outcome measures, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in intraoperative hemodynamic parameters or postoperative VAS pain scores within 48 hours after surgery (all P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative dizziness in the treatment group and control group was 7.50% (3 cases/40 cases) and 27.50% (11 cases/40 cases), respectively; the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 7.50% (3 cases/40 cases) and 25.00% (10 cases/40 cases), respectively; the incidence of postoperative constipation was 5.00% (2 cases/40 cases) and 20.00% (8 cases/40 cases), respectively; statistically significant differences were noted in the incidences of the above adverse reactions between the two groups (all P<0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction was 2.50% (1 cases/40 cases) and 7.50% (3 cases/40 cases), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
In elderly patients undergoing PFNA internal fixation, oliceridine injection provides intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesic efficacy comparable to sufentanil injection. Moreover, it significantly reduces the incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions such as dizziness, nausea and vomiting, and constipation, shortens the time to first ambulation, improves the early postoperative quality of recovery, and facilitates enhanced recovery after surgery.
To observe the clinical efficacy of roxadustat capsules combined with levocarnitine injection in patients with renal failure undergoing combined hemoperfusion (HP) and hemodialysis (HD).
Patients with chronic renal failure were randomly divided into control group and treatment group using a random number table method. The control group was treated with HP+HD combined with intravenous levocarnitine (1.0 g per session, 3 times per week). On the basis of control group, treatment group received additional oral roxadustat capsules. The starting dose was selected according to the patient’s body weight: 100 mg per dose (45-60 kg) or 120 mg per dose (≥60 kg), 3 times per week, with dose adjustments made every 4 weeks. The total course of treatment was 12 weeks. The renal function parameters, nutritional status indicators, iron metabolism-related indices, medical research council (MRC) scores and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups, and the safety was assessed.
A total of 165 patients who met the preliminary screening criteria were screened for this study. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 17 ineligible patients were excluded, resulting in 148 patients being ultimately enrolled. These participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group, with 74 patients in each. No dropouts occurred in either group during the trial. After treatment, the levels of serum creatinine (Scr) in the control group and the treatment group were (338.46±35.69) and (321.94±49.87) mL·min-1, respectively; the albumin (ALB) levels were (35.74±5.32) and (38.12±6.07) g·L-1, respectively; the hemoglobin (HB) levels were (112.26±11.79) and (118.17±8.16) g·L-1, respectively; the HB compliance rates were 60.81% and 82.43%, respectively; the serum iron (SI) levels were (13.85±2.87) and (15.34±2.93) μmol·L-1, respectively; the serum ferritin (SF) levels were (328.87±54.36) and (351.87±42.74) ng·mL-1, respectively; the transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were (28.97±6.29)% and (32.17±6.75)%, respectively; and the MRC total scores were (49.20±8.77) and (53.26±6.91) points, respectively. The treatment group demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement in the aforementioned indices compared to control group (P<0.05, P<0.01). The main adverse drug reactions of treatment group were nausea and vomiting, elevated blood pressure, muscle spasm and diarrhea; the control group had nausea and vomiting, elevated blood pressure, headache, muscle spasm and diarrhea. The total incidence of adverse drug reactions in treatment group and control group were 9.46% and 12.16%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
The combination of roxadustat capsules and levocarnitine injection effectively reduces renal impairment, improves nutritional and iron status, alleviates muscle weakness, and is well-tolerated in chronic renal failure patients undergoing combined HP+HD therapy.
To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of 2 chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma with overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2): one was the dual-targeted therapy with herceptin injection + pertuzumab injection (herceptin + pertuzumab, HP) combined with paclitaxel injection (albumin-bound) + carboplatin injection, and the other was HP dual-targeted therapy combined with paclitaxel injection alone.
Patients were divided into control group and treatment group based on the treatment regimen. Control group received HP dual-targeted therapy (herceptin for injection: initial dose of 8 mg·kg-1, followed by 6 mg·kg-1; pertuzumab injection: initial dose of 840 mg, followed by 420 mg) combined with paclitaxel injection (125 mg·m-2) for chemotherapy. Treatment group additionally received carboplatin injection with an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 on the basis of the treatment regimen of control group, with 21 days as one cycle, for a total of 6 cycles. The clinical efficacy, levels of tumor markers, survival benefits of the 2 groups were compared, and safety evaluation was also conducted.
The control and treatment groups comprised 52 and 54 subjects, respectively. After treatment, the objective response rates of the treatment group and the control group were 74.07% (40 cases/54 cases) and 53.85% (28 cases/52 cases), respectively, the carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA153) levels were (21.82±3.22) and (23.56±3.43) U·mL-1, respectively; the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were (2.22±0.53) and (2.51±0.63) μg·L-1, respectively; the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) were (53.51±7.44) and (57.43±8.04) ng·mL-1, respectively; trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) were (1.51±0.43) and (1.74±0.59) mg·L-1, respectively; there were significant differences in the above indexes between experimental group and control group (all P<0.05); the positive rates of anti-drug antibody (ADA) were 3.85% and 1.85%, respectively and the positive rates of neutralizing antibody (NAB) were 1.92% and 1.85% respectively, without statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). The median progression free survival (PFS) of treatment group was 14.5 months, which was significantly higher than that of control group (11.3 months); the median overall survival (OS) of treatment group was 30.0 months, which was significantly higher than 25.4 months of control group (all P<0.05). Survival advantage was observed in treatment group (75.93%) compared to control group (57.69%), win statistically significant difference (P<0.05). During treatment, 34 patients (62.96%) in treatment group experienced alopecia, 25 (46.30%) had nausea and 19 (35.19%) had vomiting; in control group, 43 patients (82.69%) had alopecia, 11 patients (21.15%) had nausea, and 8 patients (15.38%) had vomiting. Compared with control group, treatment group had statistically significantly higher incidence of nausea and vomiting, and statistically significantly lower incidence of alopecia (all P<0.05).
Compared with the regimen of HP dual-targeted therapy combined with paclitaxel injection alone, the regimen of HP dual-targeted therapy combined with paclitaxel injection + carboplatin injection can more effectively reduce the levels of tumor markers in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, improve the short-term and long-term efficacy and prognosis of patients, and the two regimens have similar serum immunogenic characteristics.