收藏切换
Clinical trial of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil and propofol continuous infusion on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty
收藏切换
PDF
Qi-gang MA1, 2, Gui GAO2, Le-ye BU2, Guang-hong XU1
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2025, 41(21) : 3025 - 3031
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2025, 41(21): 3025-3031
Clinical and Basic Bridging Research
Clinical trial of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil and propofol continuous infusion on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty
Full
Qi-gang MA1, 2, Gui GAO2, Le-ye BU2, Guang-hong XU1
Affiliations
  • 1.Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230031, Anhui Province, China
  • 2.Department of Anesthesiology, Lu’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lu’an 237006, Anhui Province, China
Published: 2025-11-17 doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.21.005
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of extremely low-dose dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection combined with remifentanil hydrochloride for injection and propofol emulsion injection in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

Elderly patients undergoing THA were divided into treatment group and control group according to the administration method. The control group was induced with intravenous injection of sufentanil citrate injection at a dose of 0.3 μg·kg-1, propofol emulsion injection at a dose of 1.0-2.5 mg·kg-1, and rocuronium bromide injection at a dose of 0.6-0.9 mg·kg-1. Anesthesia was maintained with intravenous infusion of propofol emulsion injection at a dose of 4-6 mg·kg-1·h-1 and remifentanil hydrochloride for injection at a dose of 0.1-0.2 μg·kg-1·h-1. The treatment group received dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection 0.2-0.5 μg·kg-1 before anesthesia induction, followed by ultra-low dose dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection 0.1-0.2 μg·kg1·h-1 intravenous infusion from after anesthesia induction to 30 min before the end of the operation, with other treatments the same as the control group. The vital signs of the two groups were compared after entering the room (T0), immediately after tracheal intubation (T1), at the time of upper tourniquet (T2), when necrotizing bone and tissue were removed (T3), when prosthesis was implanted (T4), when tourniquet was released (T5) and immediately after extubation (T6) and the modified alert sedation/score (MOAA/S) was improved; the dosage of anesthetics, the occurrence of postoperative delirium, preoperative and postoperative neuronal injury markers, and neurotransmitter markers were compared between the two groups, and safety was evaluated.

Results

A total of 120 patients were enrolled, including 63 cases in the treatment group and 57 cases in the control group. At T1, the heart rate (HR) of treatment group and control group were (79.68±7.34) and (76.79±8.40) times·min-1, respectively; at T2, they were (81.43±7.37) and (78.68±7.49) times·min-1, respectively; at T3, they were (83.83±7.53) and (80.35±7.14) times·min-1, respectively; at T4, they were (82.63±6.90) and (79.77±7.39) times·min-1, respectively; at T5, they were (81.27±7.31) and (78.16±7.51) times·min-1, respectively; at T6, they were (86.16±7.32) and (83.74±7.31) times·min-1, respectively. The heart rate of treatment group at each time were all significantly higher than those of control group (all P<0.05). At T1, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of treatment group and control group were (80.29±9.89) and (75.32±9.73) times·min-1, respectively; at T2, they were (82.10±10.00) and (77.18±9.82) times·min-1, respectively; at T3, they were (83.16±9.95) and (79.46±10.06) times·min-1, respectively; at T4, they were (82.83±9.58) and (77.19±9.92) times·min-1, respectively; at T5, they were (81.30±9.59) and (76.09±9.82) times·min-1, respectively; at T6, they were (84.14±9.87) and (82.12±9.97) times·min-1, respectively. The MAP of treatment group at each time were all significantly higher than those of control group (all P<0.05). At T1, the MOAA/S of treatment group and control group were (2.05±0.28) and (2.23±0.46) score, respectively; at T2, the scores were (1.92±0.33) and (2.09±0.51) score, respectively; at T3, the scores were (1.95±0.42) and (2.09±0.34) score, respectively; at T4, the scores were (1.92±0.33) and (2.11±0.36) score, respectively; at T5, the scores were (1.92±0.33) and (2.07±0.37) score, respectively; at T6, the scores were (3.30±0.73) and (3.77±0.80) score, respectively. The MOAA/S scores of treatment group at each time were all significantly lower than those of control group (all P<0.05). The intraoperative propofol dosage in treatment group and control group were (381.81±46.48) and (407.25±49.36) mg, respectively; the intraoperative remifentanil dosage were (14.43±1.82) and (15.14±2.00) μg, respectively; the incidence of postoperative delirium at 72 h were 15.87% and 33.33%, respectively; the postoperative 24 h central nervous system-specific protein (S100β) levels were (0.59±0.11) and (0.66±0.14) μg·mL-1, respectively; the postoperative 24 h glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels were (0.87±0.29) and (1.02±0.22) ng·mL-1, respectively; the postoperative 8 h 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) levels were (168.91±18.25) and (159.35±17.54) μg·L-1, respectively, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The total incidence of adverse drug reactions were 12.70% in treatment group and 22.81% in control group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Continuous infusion of extremely low-dose dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection combined with remifentanil hydrochloride for injection and propofol emulsion injection in elderly patients undergoing THA can effectively improve intraoperative vital signs and postoperative recovery quality, enhance analgesia and sedation, reduce the dosage of remifentanil hydrochloride for injection and propofol emulsion injection, reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium, regulate the levels of neuronal injury markers and neurotransmitter markers, and has good safety.

dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection  /  remifentanil hydrochloride for injection  /  propofol emulsion injection  /  total hip arthroplasty  /  postoperative delirium
Qi-gang MA, Gui GAO, Le-ye BU, Guang-hong XU. Clinical trial of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil and propofol continuous infusion on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2025 , 41 (21) : 3025 -3031 . DOI: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.21.005
Year 2025 volume 41 Issue 21
PDF
133
35
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.21.005
  • Receive Date:2025-05-15
  • Online Date:2026-08-05
  • Published:2025-11-17
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-05-15
Affiliations
    1.Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230031, Anhui Province, China
    2.Department of Anesthesiology, Lu’an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lu’an 237006, Anhui Province, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zglcylxzz/EN/10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.21.005
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT