doi: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010
Evaluation of science popularization professional title is the main symbol of the academic technical level and professional ability of science popularizers, which plays an important role in stabilizing the talent team and stimulating their enthusiasm. Taking the first batch of science popularizers who participated in the professional title evaluation of "Library Materials Series (Science Communication) " as the research objects, using questionnaires and semi-structured interviewing, this study analyzes the satisfaction of the participants and the hidden problems in this professional title evaluation from three aspects:evaluation index, evaluation process and evaluation service. The results show that there are still some problems. Although the professional title evaluation of science popularizers in the non-stated sector has been solved, the proportion of participants from these sectors is very small. And then, the propaganda channel is more traditional and does not fully conform to the current habit of obtaining information. Next, the participants' satisfaction with "evaluation standard" and "fair and justice sense" is not ideal. Once again, the evaluation method of representative works is not specified in detail, which is not conducive to the participants' grasp. Finally, there is room for improvement in the content and methods of expert questioning. In view of above problems, this study puts forward some countermeasures, such as increasing publicity to allow more science popularizers to participate in professional title evaluation, making evaluation standards closer to the reality of science popularization and reflecting differences, refining evaluation methods according to evaluation indexes, and optimizing defense process of "representative achievement", to ensure the diversification of participants, objectification and moderate transparency of indexes, diversification of evaluation methods, and realization of scientific scoring.