收藏切换
Field Investigation on Omani Ruxiang(Frankincense)and Research on Historical Evolution of Ruiang(Frankincense)
收藏切换
Menghua WU1, Qiaobo YE2, Eric BRAND3, Jiayan WAN1, Hui CAO1, Zhongzhen ZHAO3, 4
Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 2026, 44(4) : 28 - 33
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 2026, 44(4): 28-33
• Target on National Project •
Field Investigation on Omani Ruxiang(Frankincense)and Research on Historical Evolution of Ruiang(Frankincense)
Full
Menghua WU1, Qiaobo YE2, Eric BRAND3, Jiayan WAN1, Hui CAO1, Zhongzhen ZHAO3, 4
Affiliations
  • 1.School of Pharmacy of Jinan University, Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Lingnan(Southern China), Lingnan Resources Branch of National Engineering Research Center for Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatics, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
  • 2.School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China
  • 3.Institute of Compendium of Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • 4.School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong 999077, China
Published: 2026-04-10 doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2026.04.007
Outline
收藏切换

Ruxiang(Frankincense)has been imported since the ancient times and is one of the commonly used traditional Chinese medicines in clinical practice. However, there is a discrepancy between the actual used species and those recorded in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Combining field investigations with textual research helps to clarify the truth. This study aims to restore the historical context of Ruxiang(Frankincense), conducting the field investigations in Oman, the main producing area of Ruxiang(Frankincense), covering the distribution of Ruxiang(Boswellia)plants, the origin of their Latin names, harvesting and processing methods, specifications and producing areas. It also integrates the researches such as consulting specimens from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, investigations at port drug inspection institutes and medicinal material markets, as well as sorting out the historical literature, to explore the historical evolution and changes of Ruxiang(Frankincense)in terms of producing areas and species. The results show that Ruxiang(Frankincense)was introduced to China as early as in the Han Dynasty via land and sea routes, originating from the Arabian region, and is the resin exuded from the bark of Arabic Ruxiangshu(Boswellia sacra). Both Kashi Ruxiangshu(Boswellia carterii)and Kashi Ruxiangshu(Boswellia bhaw-dajiana)recorded in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia are synonyms of Arabic Ruxiangshu(Boswellia sacra). Ruxiang(Frankincense)is obtained by cutting the bark with a special tool called “menguf”;after the exuded resin dries, it is harvested using the same “menguf”. It is classified into four types according to its producing area, with the best quality coming from inland regions with a dry and hot climate. During the mid to late Tang Dynasty, maritime imports became the main source, still dominated by Arabic Ruxiangshu(Boswellia sacra). In the Song Dynasty, new producing areas of frankincense emerged in East African countries such as Somalia, and the origin of Ruxiang(Frankincense)included multiple species of the Boswellia genus. In the Ming and Qing dynasties, Sri Lanka and India were added as the new producing areas, and Chiye Ruxiangshu(Boswellia serrata)was included as an additional origin of frankincense. In modern times, Sudan has become the main producing area, with Zhipi Ruxiangshu(Boswellia papyrifera)as the primary source of Ruxiang(Frankincense), which is inconsistent with both the records in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and the historical facts that Oman was the main producing area and Arabic Ruxiangshu(Boswellia sacra)was the primary origin of Ruxiang(Frankincense)in the past dynasties. The research results are helpful for restoring the ancient species and producing areas of Ruxiang(Frankincense), and provide references for the revision of the Latin names and species of Ruxiang(Frankincense)in the next edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and the addition of producing countries of frankincense in the Catalogue ofNon-first-time Imported Medicinal Materials.

Ruxiang(Frankincense)  /  Arabic Ruxiangshu(Boswellia sacra)  /  Oman  /  field investigation  /  historical evolution  /  textual research
吴孟华, 叶俏波, Eric BRAND, 万嘉燕, 曹晖, 赵中振. 阿曼乳香实地考与乳香历史沿革. 中华中医药学刊, 2026 , 44 (4) : 28 -33 . DOI: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2026.04.007
Menghua WU, Qiaobo YE, Eric BRAND, Jiayan WAN, Hui CAO, Zhongzhen ZHAO. Field Investigation on Omani Ruxiang(Frankincense)and Research on Historical Evolution of Ruiang(Frankincense)[J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2026 , 44 (4) : 28 -33 . DOI: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2026.04.007
Year 2026 volume 44 Issue 4
98
19
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2026.04.007
  • Online Date:2026-10-14
  • Published:2026-04-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Funding
Affiliations
    1.School of Pharmacy of Jinan University, Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Lingnan(Southern China), Lingnan Resources Branch of National Engineering Research Center for Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatics, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
    2.School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China
    3.Institute of Compendium of Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
    4.School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong 999077, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zhzyyxk/EN/10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2026.04.007
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT