Full
Outline
Based on the literature research method and following the principle of terminology standardization，this study used Delphi method to preliminarily form an expert consensus on TCM symptom terminology for coronary heart disease（CHD），which laid a foundation for the formation of TCM symptom terminology standards and clinical treatment research.
According to the results of the previous literature research，the Delphi method was used to compile an expert questionnaire，which mainly included the terms of the four diagnosis symptoms of CHD. Three rounds of questionnaires were distributed electronically，and the questionnaire results were entered into Microsoft Office Excel 2021. After the establishment of the database，IBM SPSSStatistics 26.0 statistical software was applied，and the indicators such as expert positive coefficient，expert authority degree，expert opinion concentration degree and coordination degree were analyzed statistically.
The expert positive coefficients of the three rounds of questionnaire were 85.71%，91.43% and 100.00% respectively，and the average expert authority coefficient was 0.86，indicating a high degree of authority. The Kendall harmony coefficient of the first two rounds of Delphi expert consultation was between 0.2 and 0.5. The expert consistency coefficient of the second round was higher than that of the first round，close to 0.5，and the chi-square test results of the Kendall harmony coefficient of the two rounds were less than 0.01，indicating that the expert opinions were gradually centralized and unified. In the third round of questionnaire，the experts actively put forward written suggestions，which were adopted by the research group.
After literature research and three rounds of expert questionnaires，according to the index of expert authority，concentration of opinions，the terms of TCM symptoms，their English translations and definitions in the four diagnostic categories of CHD were preliminarily obtained. In summary，the Delphi method was adopted in this study，the process was standardized，and the results were scientific and reliable. The expert consensus on TCM symptom terms of CHD was basically reached.
39
17
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
