Toinvestigate population preferences and willingness to pay for colorectal cancer diagnostic strategies, andto provide evidence to optimize the initial screening and diagnosis service pathway and develop intervention strategies.
A discrete choice experiment was designed incorporating six attributes: appointment waiting time, number of healthcare visits, pre-diagnostic preparation, invasiveness, diagnostic accuracy, and out-of-pocket cost. In a central urban district of Shanghai, respondents were presented with a hypothetical scenario in which they had tested positive in an initial screening for colorectal cancer. Based on this scenario, their preferences for diagnostic strategies were elicited. A mixed logit model was subsequently employed to analyze population preferences and willingness to pay (WTP).
Appointment waiting time, pre-diagnostic preparation, invasiveness, diagnostic accuracy and out-of-pocket cost had significant effects on respondents’ choices of diagnostic strategies. Diagnostic accuracy was the most important attribute, accounting for 53.61% of relative importance. This was followed by pre-diagnostic preparation and invasiveness, which together accounted for 26.33%. Respondents were willing to pay an additional 623.50 RMB to switch from an invasive to a non-invasive diagnostic option.
Preferences for colorectal cancer diagnostic strategies are primarily driven by diagnostic accuracy, with trade-offs involving the absence of pre-diagnostic preparation, non-invasiveness, shorter appointment waiting times, and lower out-of-pocket costs. It is recommended that communities further strengthen health education on the accuracy of colonoscopy diagnosis, provide non-invasive diagnostic alternatives, and improve referral efficiency. These measures may enhance population adherence to diagnostic procedures, thereby improving the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs and maximizing population health benefits.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |