收藏切换
Mendelian randomization study of the causal relationship between tea intake and colorectal cancer
收藏切换
PDF
Ying-shu ZHOU1, Xin-lei LI1, Wen-long LI1, Pei-hui LIU2, Fei LIU3
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2024, 51(4) : 613 - 618
Less
收藏切换
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2024, 51(4): 613-618
Nutrition and Foold Hygiene
Mendelian randomization study of the causal relationship between tea intake and colorectal cancer
Full
Ying-shu ZHOU1, Xin-lei LI1, Wen-long LI1, Pei-hui LIU2, Fei LIU3
Affiliations
  • The Second Department of General Surgery, Daqing People’s Hospital of Heilongjiang Province, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163711, China
Published: 2024-02-25 doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202311082
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To study the causal relationship between tea intake and the incidence of colorectal cancer using two-sample Mendelian randomization.

Methods

Using the colorectal cancer genome-wide association analysis data (GWAS ID: ieu-b-4965) and tea intake genome-wide association analysis data (GWAS ID: ukb-b-6066) in the IEU OPEN GWAS public database, we summarized and screened the two data sets for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which were closely related to and independent of tea intake as instrumental variables (IVs). By using MR-Egger and inverse variance weighting in two-sample Mendelian randomization, Five methods (IVW), weighted median method (Weighted Median), simple model (Simple Mode) and weighted model (Weighted Mode) were used to determine the causal analysis between tea intake and the incidence of colorectal cancer. OR and 95% CI were used to examine the causal relationship between tea intake and the incidence of colorectal cancer. MR-PRESSO was used for outlier testing. IVW (Cochran Q test) and MR-Egger (Rücker Q test) were used for heterogeneity analysis. Egger-intercept was used for pleiotropy test, sensitivity analysis was performed by leave-one-out method, and funnel plot was used to analyze the presence of potential bias.

Results

39 SNPs were finally included, and MR-PRESSO found no outlier SNPs, P=0.237>0.05; in terms of causality determination: IVW (OR=0.996, 95% CI:0.990-1.002, P=0.293), MR-Egger (OR=0.992, 95% CI:0.977-1.007, P=0.293), Weighted Median (OR=0.997, 95% CI: 0.987-1.007, P=0.479), Simple Mode (OR=0.996, 95% CI: 0.976-1.017, P=0.724), Weighted Mode (OR=0.996, 95% CI: 0.985-1.007, P=0.473). The above results showed that there was no causal relationship between tea intake and the incidence of colorectal cancer. In the heterogeneity test, P=0.181>0.05 in Cochran Q test and P=0.167>0.05 in Rucker Q test. There was no significant heterogeneity. The Egger-intercept test showed that P=0.489>0.05 and was not pleiotropic. The leave-one-out method was removed one by one, and no SNPs significantly affecting the results were found. The funnel plot was basically symmetrical, indicating that the main results were reliable.

Conclusion

There is no causal relationship between tea intake and the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Mendelian randomization  /  Tea intake  /  Colorectal cancer  /  Causality  /  Prognosis
Ying-shu ZHOU, Xin-lei LI, Wen-long LI, Pei-hui LIU, Fei LIU. Mendelian randomization study of the causal relationship between tea intake and colorectal cancer[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2024 , 51 (4) : 613 -618 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202311082
Year 2024 volume 51 Issue 4
PDF
70
33
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202311082
  • Receive Date:2023-11-05
  • Online Date:2026-03-19
  • Published:2024-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-11-05
Funding
Affiliations
    The Second Department of General Surgery, Daqing People’s Hospital of Heilongjiang Province, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163711, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyfyx/EN/10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202311082
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT