收藏切换
Source analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in PM2.5 in Huai’an city from 2020 to 2022
收藏切换
PDF
Shan-cai LUO, Wen ZHANG, Guo-cai CHEN, Man JIANG, Rui FU, Heng-kang GE
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2024, 51(11) : 1962 - 1967
Less
收藏切换
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2024, 51(11): 1962-1967
Environmental and Occupational Health
Source analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in PM2.5 in Huai’an city from 2020 to 2022
Full
Shan-cai LUO, Wen ZHANG, Guo-cai CHEN, Man JIANG, Rui FU, Heng-kang GE
Affiliations
  • Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai’an, Jiangsu 223001, China
Published: 2024-06-10 doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202403168
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To evaluate the health risk of heavy metal concentration, source analysis and inhalation pathway of PM2.5 in ambient air of Huai’an city. Methods The ambient air PM2.5 samples were collected regularly at a monitoring site in Huai’an city from 2020 to 2022. The contents of 10 heavy metals in PM2.5 were determined by ICP-MS, and the traceability analysis of heavy metals was carried out by enrichment factor method and principal component analysis. According to the national“Technical Standard for Assessing Population Health Risk”, the health risk of heavy metals to the population was evaluated. Results The annual average values of Al, Mn, Pb, Cr, Ni, As, Se, Sb, Cd and Tl in PM2.5 of Huai’an city from 2020 to 2022 were 131.11, 28.52, 20.61, 8.09, 5.95, 4.11, 2.62, 1.84, 0.76, and 0.18 ng/m3, respectively. The concentration levels of these metals in winter and spring were higher than those in summer and spring (Z=2.390-7.182, P < 0.05). The results of enrichment factor analysis showed that the elements EF of Se, Cd, Sb, As, Pb, and Tl 6 were more than 100. The principal component analysis showed that the heavy metals in PM2.5 in Huai’an city mainly came from mixed pollution of traffic, industrial production, coal combustion, and natural emission. For non-carcinogenic effects, Sb, Al, As, Cd, Cr, Mn, Ni, and Se 8 were lower than the screening concentration, and the risk of non-carcinogenic effects (HQ) was less than 1. For carcinogenic effects, the excess carcinogenic risks of As, Cd, and Cr were 1.77 × 10-5,1.37 × 10-6, and 9.70 × 10-5, respectively. Conclusion The sources of heavy metals in PM2.5 in Huai’an city are multiple compound pollution. The non-carcinogenic effects of Sb, Al, As, Cd, Cr, Mn,Ni, and Se 8 are acceptable, but As, Cd and Cr have potential carcinogenic risk.

PM2.5  /  Heavy metals  /  Pollution characteristics  /  Source analysis  /  Health risk assessment
Shan-cai LUO, Wen ZHANG, Guo-cai CHEN, Man JIANG, Rui FU, Heng-kang GE. Source analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in PM2.5 in Huai’an city from 2020 to 2022[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2024 , 51 (11) : 1962 -1967 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202403168
Year 2024 volume 51 Issue 11
PDF
66
30
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202403168
  • Receive Date:2024-03-13
  • Online Date:2026-03-18
  • Published:2024-06-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-03-13
Funding
Affiliations
    Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huai’an, Jiangsu 223001, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyfyx/EN/10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202403168
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT