收藏切换
Screening of occupatinal health risk assessment methods for condensate oil in natural gas extraction
收藏切换
Yue-yuan ZHU1, Lin-yue LI1, Yong-wei WANG1, 2
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2026, 53(14) : 2573 - 2580
Less
收藏切换
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2026, 53(14): 2573-2580
• Environmental and Occupational Health •
Screening of occupatinal health risk assessment methods for condensate oil in natural gas extraction
Full
Yue-yuan ZHU1, Lin-yue LI1, Yong-wei WANG1, 2
Affiliations
  • West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
Published: 2026-07-25 doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202512345
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To identify the main chemical occupational hazard factors and their exposure levels associated with condensate oil in natural gas exploitation, and to explore occupational health risk assessment methods for chemical hazards in this industry, so as to provide a basis for accurately preventing occupational hazards and protecting the health of occupational populations.

Methods

Based on occupational health surveys, condensate oil component analysis and continuous monitoring of chemical occupational hazards, the occupational health risks of condensate oil exposure in natural gas exploitation were assessed using the comprehensive index method, ICMM quantitative assessment method and occupational hazard risk index method.

Results

The main occupational hazard factors of condensate oil in natural gas exploitation were benzene, toluene, xylene, n-hexane and cyclohexane. Their time-weighted average concentrations (CTWA) ranged within 1%-50% of the occupational exposure limits (OELs). Among the 10 gas production well stations, only xylene concentration showed statistical significance (P<0.001), while concentrations of the other four chemical toxicants were generally consistent (P>0.05). Short-term exposure concentrations (CSTEL) of all five typical chemical toxicants were detected in the gas field water treatment station, with generally consistent concentrations (P>0.05). Analysis of occupational health risk levels showed that according to the comprehensive index method, benzene was rated as extremely high risk in both gas production stations and gas field water treatment stations, toluene, n-hexane and cyclohexane as high risk, and xylene as medium risk. According to the occupational hazard risk index method, benzene was moderate risk in the gas field water treatment station and mild risk in gas production stations, while all other factors were assessed as no risk. In the ICMM quantitative assessment method, only benzene in the gas field water treatment station was rated as intolerable risk, and all other factors were rated as tolerable risk. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences in the rating distributions among the three methods (P<0.05), indicating that different assessment systems varied in their ability to discriminate risk levels of hazardous factors.

Conclusion

Benzene, toluene, xylene, n-hexane and cyclohexane should be the key occupational hazards concerned in condensate oil exposure in the natural gas exploitation industry. The improved ICMM quantitative assessment is a suitable method for occupational health risk assessment of condensate oil in natural gas exploitation.

Condensate oil  /  Typical chemical toxicants  /  Occupational health  /  Risk assessment  /  Screening
朱玥爰, 李林玥, 王永伟. 天然气开采凝析油职业健康风险评估方法筛选. 现代预防医学, 2026 , 53 (14) : 2573 -2580 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202512345
Yue-yuan ZHU, Lin-yue LI, Yong-wei WANG. Screening of occupatinal health risk assessment methods for condensate oil in natural gas extraction[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2026 , 53 (14) : 2573 -2580 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202512345
Year 2026 volume 53 Issue 14
176
68
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202512345
  • Receive Date:2025-12-21
  • Online Date:2026-09-28
  • Published:2026-07-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-21
Funding
Affiliations
    West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyfyx/EN/10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202512345
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT