收藏切换
Comparative study on Salmonella serotyping based on multiplex qPCR and whole-genome sequencing
收藏切换
Wei-feng HUANG, Gao-peng LEI, Yu-lan HUANG, Lin ZHANG, Tao XIAO, Li LIU, Hong LV, Wen-xia ZHAO, Xiao-rong YANG
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2026, 53(11) : 2068 - 2073
Less
收藏切换
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2026, 53(11): 2068-2073
• Experimental Technology and Applications •
Comparative study on Salmonella serotyping based on multiplex qPCR and whole-genome sequencing
Full
Wei-feng HUANG, Gao-peng LEI, Yu-lan HUANG, Lin ZHANG, Tao XIAO, Li LIU, Hong LV, Wen-xia ZHAO, Xiao-rong YANG
Affiliations
  • Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
Published: 2026-06-10 doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202511316
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To analyze and compare the Salmonella serotyping methods based on multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (multiplex qPCR) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and to evaluate the serotyping capability and application scenarios of each method.

Methods

A total of 242 Salmonella strains isolated in our province, covering 96 serotypes, were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. The serotypes of these strains were predicted using SeqSero2 and SISTR, followed by a concordance analysis of the results. Meanwhile, multiplex qPCR was employed for the identification of each serotype, so as to assess the accuracy and applicability of this method.

Results

Three methods were used to detect 96 Salmonella serovars. The overall concordance rates of SeqSero2 and SISTR were both 87.50% (84/96), which were significantly higher than that of multiplex qPCR (52.08%, 50/96). For the 242 Salmonella strains, the discordance rates of SeqSero2 and SISTR were 2.48% (6/242) and 7.85% (19/242), respectively. The multiplex qPCR method could only accurately distinguish common serotypes. The main reasons for the discordance of the SeqSero2 method included the deletion or error of O antigen genes. The main reasons for partial concordance were the interference from the similarity of H antigen alleles and the inability to distinguish some serovars in the C2 serogroup that differ only in the O6 antigen. The main reasons for the discordance of the SISTR method were cgMLST cluster misclassification, O antigen gene deletion, and the inability to distinguish monophasic variant strains.

Conclusion

The WGS-based serotyping method exhibits high accuracy and can replace the traditional serum agglutination test for Salmonella serotyping in numerous application scenarios. Although the multiplex qPCR method has limitations with a lower concordance rate than WGS-based methods, it features a short detection time and can accurately identify common serotypes, thus being suitable for emergency rapid detection.

Salmonella  /  Serotyping  /  Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)  /  Multiplex qPCR
黄伟峰, 雷高鹏, 黄玉兰, 张林, 肖桃, 刘丽, 吕虹, 赵雯霞, 杨小蓉. 多重荧光PCR和基于全基因组测序的沙门菌血清分型方法比较研究. 现代预防医学, 2026 , 53 (11) : 2068 -2073 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202511316
Wei-feng HUANG, Gao-peng LEI, Yu-lan HUANG, Lin ZHANG, Tao XIAO, Li LIU, Hong LV, Wen-xia ZHAO, Xiao-rong YANG. Comparative study on Salmonella serotyping based on multiplex qPCR and whole-genome sequencing[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2026 , 53 (11) : 2068 -2073 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202511316
Year 2026 volume 53 Issue 11
31
17
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202511316
  • Receive Date:2025-11-22
  • Online Date:2026-11-02
  • Published:2026-06-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-22
Funding
Affiliations
    Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyfyx/EN/10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202511316
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT