收藏切换
Association of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio with breast cancer:a cross-sectional study based on NHANES
收藏切换
Xiao-yu LI1, Ke HONG1, Meng-fan CHEN1, Chang YAO1, 2
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2026, 53(5) : 954 - 960
Less
收藏切换
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2026, 53(5): 954-960
• Clinical Medicine and Prevention •
Association of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio with breast cancer:a cross-sectional study based on NHANES
Full
Xiao-yu LI1, Ke HONG1, Meng-fan CHEN1, Chang YAO1, 2
Affiliations
  • Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
Published: 2026-03-10 doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202509108
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

Systemic inflammation and immune status play critical roles in carcinogenesis. However, evidence regarding the association between the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the risk of breast cancer (BC) remains limited.This study aims to investigate the relationship between LMR and BC risk.

Methods

A total of 13 519 participants with complete LMR and BC data were identified from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005—2018. Multivariable weighted logistic regression models, restricted cubic spline analyses, and subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the independent association between LMR and BC risk. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.

Results

A significant U-shaped association was observed between LMR and BC risk, with an inflection point at 1.82. When LMR was ≤1.82, it was inversely associated with BC risk, with each one-unit increase in LMR corresponding to a 76% reduction in BC risk (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.18-0.31). Above this threshold, the association was no longer statistically significant. In the LMR quartile groups, the highest quartile (Q4) showed a significant reduction in breast cancer risk of approximately 47% compared to the Q1 group (OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.74). Likelihood ratio tests indicated that the piecewise linear model provided a better fit than the linear model. Subgroup and interaction analyses revealed significant differences in the association between LMR and BC risk between participants with and without diabetes.

Conclusion

This study is the first to demonstrate a non-linear (broad U-shaped) association between LMR and BC risk,indicating that both low and high LMR levels are associated with an increased risk of BC. Maintaining LMR within a stable range may help prevent and slow the development and progression of breast cancer. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio  /  NHANES  /  Breast cancer  /  Risk assessment  /  Inflammatory markers
李晓玉, 洪珂, 陈梦帆, 姚昶. 淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值与乳腺癌的相关性——一项横断面研究. 现代预防医学, 2026 , 53 (5) : 954 -960 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202509108
Xiao-yu LI, Ke HONG, Meng-fan CHEN, Chang YAO. Association of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio with breast cancer:a cross-sectional study based on NHANES[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2026 , 53 (5) : 954 -960 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202509108
Year 2026 volume 53 Issue 5
28
15
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202509108
  • Receive Date:2025-09-10
  • Online Date:2026-11-02
  • Published:2026-03-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-09-10
Funding
Affiliations
    Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyfyx/EN/10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202509108
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT