收藏切换
Analysis of influencing factors on payment differences in spinal surgery patients under DRG payment
收藏切换
Ying ZHOU1, Feng-lei CHEN1, Jian-hua MENG1, Neng-hai BIN1, Yu-yin HU2, Jing QIAN1
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2025, 52(22) : 4132 - 4137
Less
收藏切换
Modern Preventive Medicine | 2025, 52(22): 4132-4137
• Health Policy and Management •
Analysis of influencing factors on payment differences in spinal surgery patients under DRG payment
Full
Ying ZHOU1, Feng-lei CHEN1, Jian-hua MENG1, Neng-hai BIN1, Yu-yin HU2, Jing QIAN1
Affiliations
  • Medical Insurance Management Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, China
Published: 2025-11-25 doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202506355
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To explore the influencing factors of payment differences in patients undergoing spine-related surgeries under the Diagnosis-Related Groups(DRG)payment system, and to provide evidencefor improving hospital medical insurance fund surplus and promoting high-quality hospital development.

Methods

We collected data from 1 798 inpatients undergoing spine-related surgeries and grouped under the DRG system, along with their medical insurance settlement cost information, at a large Grade-A tertiary hospital in Guangxi from January 1,2022 to December 31,2024. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, and multivariate regression models were employed to analyze factors influencing medical insurance payment differences. Structural equation modeling was further applied to validate correlations among variables.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed that age, average length of stay, ADRG group, insurance fund type, case type, presence of complications, primary diagnosis group, and VBP participation status were significant factors influencing medical insurance payment differences in spine-related surgical patients(P<0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the top three factors influencing payment differences were ADRG group(β=-1.704,t=-29.369,P<0.001), centralized procurement status(β=-1.244,t=-17.705,P<0.001), and case type(β=-1.085,t=-11.257,P<0.001). Structural equation modeling showed ADRG group as the most influential factor with a path coefficient of 0.55, followed by procurement policy(0.36)and case type(0.21).

Conclusion

ADRG grouping is the primary determinant of payment differences. Under DRG payment systems, healthcare authorities should optimize disease group weights to reflect actual medical resource consumption and technical complexity. They should actively promote centralized volume procurement of high-value consumables while strengthening synergies between DRG payment and procurement policies. Hospitals need to optimize clinical pathways, control medical costs through rational diagnosis and treatment, thereby improving DRG payment difference levels.

Diagnosis Related Groups  /  Payment difference  /  Influencing factors  /  Centralized volume-based procurement  /  Structural equation modeling
周颖, 陈凤磊, 蒙健华, 宾能海, 胡雨茵, 钱静. DRG付费下脊柱有关手术患者支付差影响因素分析. 现代预防医学, 2025 , 52 (22) : 4132 -4137 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202506355
Ying ZHOU, Feng-lei CHEN, Jian-hua MENG, Neng-hai BIN, Yu-yin HU, Jing QIAN. Analysis of influencing factors on payment differences in spinal surgery patients under DRG payment[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2025 , 52 (22) : 4132 -4137 . DOI: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202506355
Year 2025 volume 52 Issue 22
45
20
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202506355
  • Receive Date:2025-06-23
  • Online Date:2026-10-29
  • Published:2025-11-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-06-23
Funding
Affiliations
    Medical Insurance Management Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyfyx/EN/10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202506355
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT