收藏切换
Design issues of radial horizontal support plate limiting brackets of pipes: analysis and improvement
收藏切换
Xiaojun WU1, Cong WANG2, Yujun KANG1, Hongguo LIU3, Xudong CHEN1, Lei DONG1, Yannan REN4, Jian WANG4, Nanlin LI1
Thermal Power Generation | 2025, 54(10) : 168 - 174
Less
收藏切换
Thermal Power Generation | 2025, 54(10): 168-174
• Power generation technology forum •
Design issues of radial horizontal support plate limiting brackets of pipes: analysis and improvement
Full
Xiaojun WU1, Cong WANG2, Yujun KANG1, Hongguo LIU3, Xudong CHEN1, Lei DONG1, Yannan REN4, Jian WANG4, Nanlin LI1
Affiliations
  • 1.Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China
  • 2.Huaneng Tongchuan Zhaojin Coal and Power Generation Co., Ltd., Tongchuan 727104, China
  • 3.CHN Energy Shenfu (Shishi) Power Generation Co., Ltd., Shishi 362712, China
  • 4.Dandong Power Plant, Huaneng International Power Co., Ltd., Dandong 118300, China
Published: 2025-10-25 doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202501030
Outline
收藏切换

With the increase in parameters and capacity of newly built coal-fired units, the expansion of critical long-distance and large-diameter pipelines due to high parameters becomes more significant, making the design of supports and hangers particularly important. In a case involving a 2×660 MW ultra-supercritical unit, the diagonal brace of a rigid hanger tripod supporting the main steam pipeline buckled, resulting in a pipeline subsidence of nearly 130 mm. A comprehensive inspection of the pipeline supports and hangers was conducted, along with mechanical analysis of the statically indeterminate tripod structure and stability analysis of the diagonal brace. The study concluded that the failure of the diagonal brace and the pipeline sinking were primarily caused by an incorrect design of the radial horizontal restraint gap. Additionally, the excessive constant force of the constant hanger also contributed to the damage of the diagonal brace. This research not only analyzed the design flaws of the pipeline supports and hangers, but also proposed an engineering solution to optimize the restraint gap, which was validated on-site. A rectification plan involving horizontal limit adjustment and pipeline lifting was developed and implemented, successfully restoring the pipeline to its designed state and resolving the issue. This problem is highly representative in the construction of large-scale power units and should draw the attention of designers to avoid similar issues in future projects.

pipe  /  tripod  /  sway rod bending  /  radial horizontal restraint  /  gap
吴晓俊, 王聪, 康豫军, 刘鸿国, 陈旭东, 董雷, 任延南, 王建, 李楠林. 管道径向水平支撑板限位支架设计问题分析与改进. 热力发电, 2025 , 54 (10) : 168 -174 . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202501030
Xiaojun WU, Cong WANG, Yujun KANG, Hongguo LIU, Xudong CHEN, Lei DONG, Yannan REN, Jian WANG, Nanlin LI. Design issues of radial horizontal support plate limiting brackets of pipes: analysis and improvement[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2025 , 54 (10) : 168 -174 . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202501030
  • Science and Technology Project of China Huaneng Group Co., Ltd.(HNKJ22-H103)
Year 2025 volume 54 Issue 10
1049
519
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202501030
  • Receive Date:2025-01-14
  • Online Date:2026-03-05
  • Published:2025-10-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-01-14
Funding
Science and Technology Project of China Huaneng Group Co., Ltd.(HNKJ22-H103)
Affiliations
    1.Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China
    2.Huaneng Tongchuan Zhaojin Coal and Power Generation Co., Ltd., Tongchuan 727104, China
    3.CHN Energy Shenfu (Shishi) Power Generation Co., Ltd., Shishi 362712, China
    4.Dandong Power Plant, Huaneng International Power Co., Ltd., Dandong 118300, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlfd/EN/10.19666/j.rlfd.202501030
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT