收藏切换
Research progresses and challenges in health risk assessment methods for atmospheric bioaerosols
收藏切换
PDF
Linghui PENG1, 2, Xuemei CAI1, 2, Yiyi HU1, 2, Simeng ZHANG1, 2, Zhishu LIANG1, 2, Hailing LI1, 2, Guiying LI1, 2, Taicheng AN1, 2, *
Science & Technology Review | 2026, 44(15) : 59 - 70
Less
收藏切换
Science & Technology Review | 2026, 44(15): 59-70
Exclusive
Research progresses and challenges in health risk assessment methods for atmospheric bioaerosols
Full
Linghui PENG1, 2, Xuemei CAI1, 2, Yiyi HU1, 2, Simeng ZHANG1, 2, Zhishu LIANG1, 2, Hailing LI1, 2, Guiying LI1, 2, Taicheng AN1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao Joint Laboratory of Contaminant Exposure and Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health Risk Control, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 2School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Excellence Center for Basic Research on Ecological Security and Green Development in the Bay Area, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control, Guangzhou 510006, China
Published: 2026-08-13 doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.05.00013
Outline
收藏切换

Bioaerosols contain infectious and pathogenic microorganisms, emitting from hospitals, waste treatment plants, livestock farms and so on, so the workers in these situations face certain health risks due to long−term exposure to high concentrations of bioaerosols. By systematically reviewing recent literatures on the health risk assessment of bioaerosols, this study collates and summarizes the existing assessment methods health risks posed by bioaerosols. Several critical issues are identified, including inconsistent calculation methods, indiscriminate adoption of assessment methods for chemical substances, lack of localized exposure parameters, and absence of reference exposure doses−effect relationships. These deficiencies result in the lack of scientific rationality in bioaerosol health risk assessments, leading to difficult comparisons. Based on the current research, this review proposes that health risk assessment of bioaerosols should unify the calculation methods, adopt local exposure parameters, study the corresponding dose−effect relationship, derive the local reference exposure dose (RfD), and accelerate the formulation of relevant standards, which is helpful to accurately assesses the health risks of bioaerosols.

atmospheric bioaerosols  /  health risk assessment  /  non−carcinogenic risk
Linghui PENG, Xuemei CAI, Yiyi HU, Simeng ZHANG, Zhishu LIANG, Hailing LI, Guiying LI, Taicheng AN. Research progresses and challenges in health risk assessment methods for atmospheric bioaerosols[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2026 , 44 (15) : 59 -70 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.05.00013
Year 2026 volume 44 Issue 15
PDF
366
193
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.05.00013
  • Receive Date:2026-05-06
  • Online Date:2026-08-31
  • Published:2026-08-13
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-05-06
  • Revised:2026-06-14
Funding
Affiliations
    1Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao Joint Laboratory of Contaminant Exposure and Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health Risk Control, Guangzhou 510006, China
    2School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Excellence Center for Basic Research on Ecological Security and Green Development in the Bay Area, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control, Guangzhou 510006, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.05.00013
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT