收藏切换
A comparative study of robotic versus open liver resection for patients with HBV−related hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis
收藏切换
PDF
Yu CAO1, 2, Tianchen ZHANG3, Zhenqi LI1, 2, Chen FENG1, 2, Guanyu WANG1, Rong LIU1, 2, *
Science & Technology Review | 2026, 44(11) : 110 - 121
Less
收藏切换
Science & Technology Review | 2026, 44(11): 110-121
Papers
A comparative study of robotic versus open liver resection for patients with HBV−related hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis
Full
Yu CAO1, 2, Tianchen ZHANG3, Zhenqi LI1, 2, Chen FENG1, 2, Guanyu WANG1, Rong LIU1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Senior Department of Hepato−Pancreato−Biliary Surgery, Beijing 100853, China
  • 2Chinese People's Liberation Army Medical College, Beijing 100853, China
  • 3Lanzhou University, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou 730099, China
Published: 2026-06-13 doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.03.00046
Outline
收藏切换

Cirrhosis is highly prevalent among patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)−related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In HCC patients with cirrhosis, hepatic resection is technically more challenging and is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. Moreover, surgical trauma and postoperative complications may further adversely affect long−term prognosis. Compared with open liver resection (OLR), robotic liver resection (RLR) has theoretical minimally invasive advantages; however, systematic evidence remains lacking as to whether RLR can improve short−term postoperative outcomes as well as long−term prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. This study aimed to compare the short−term postoperative outcomes and recurrence and survival outcomes between RLR and OLR in patients with HBV−related HCC and cirrhosis. Patients with HBV−related HCC and cirrhosis who underwent their first R0 liver resection at our center between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent either RLR or OLR. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Short−term postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Kaplan−Meier analysis and the Log−rank test were used to compare recurrence−free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the RLR and OLR groups. A total of 198 patients were included in this study, including 74 patients in the OLR group and 124 patients in the RLR group. After 1:2 PSM between the OLR and RLR groups, 50 patients in the OLR group and 82 patients in the RLR group were included in the matched cohort. Before PSM, compared with the OLR group, the RLR group had shorter operative time and postoperative length of stay, less intraoperative blood loss, a lower intraoperative transfusion rate, and lower incidences of overall postoperative complications, postoperative ascites, and Clavien−Dindo grade I–II complications (all P<0.05). After PSM, the RLR group still showed less intraoperative blood loss (100 mL vs. 200 mL, P = 0.001), a shorter postoperative length of stay (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, P<0.001), and a lower incidence of postoperative ascites (4.88% vs. 18.00%, P = 0.031). Regarding long−term prognosis, no significant differences in RFS (P = 0.706) or OS (P = 0.624) were observed between the RLR and OLR groups after PSM. In patients with HBV−related HCC and cirrhosis, RLR was associated with less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter postoperative length of stay, and a lower incidence of postoperative ascites compared with OLR, while no significant differences were observed between the two approaches in postoperative recurrence or survival outcomes.

hepatocellular carcinoma  /  cirrhosis  /  robotic liver resection  /  propensity score matching
Yu CAO, Tianchen ZHANG, Zhenqi LI, Chen FENG, Guanyu WANG, Rong LIU. A comparative study of robotic versus open liver resection for patients with HBV−related hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2026 , 44 (11) : 110 -121 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.03.00046
Year 2026 volume 44 Issue 11
PDF
241
122
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.03.00046
  • Receive Date:2026-03-15
  • Online Date:2026-06-23
  • Published:2026-06-13
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-03-15
  • Revised:2026-05-18
Affiliations
    1The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Senior Department of Hepato−Pancreato−Biliary Surgery, Beijing 100853, China
    2Chinese People's Liberation Army Medical College, Beijing 100853, China
    3Lanzhou University, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou 730099, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2026.03.00046
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT