收藏切换
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SWAL−QOL questionnaire in patients with cognitive dysfunction
收藏切换
PDF
Yixuan WANG1, Yuchen QIAO1, Kun YANG1, Zhe CHEN2, Yi TANG1, *, Qi QIN1, *
Science & Technology Review | 2025, 43(20) : 115 - 124
Less
收藏切换
Science & Technology Review | 2025, 43(20): 115-124
Papers
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SWAL−QOL questionnaire in patients with cognitive dysfunction
Full
Yixuan WANG1, Yuchen QIAO1, Kun YANG1, Zhe CHEN2, Yi TANG1, *, Qi QIN1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders & Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing 100053, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Rizhao Municipal Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Rizhao 276800, China
Published: 2025-10-28 doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2025.03.00126
Outline
收藏切换

Swallowing disorders have a high incidence among patients with cognitive dysfunction and significantly impact their quality of life. The Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL−QOL), a widely used tool for assessing swallowing function and related quality of life, has previously excluded individuals with Mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction from its applicable population in prior studies. This study is the first to systematically validate the applicability of the Chinese version of SWAL−QOL in patients with cognitive dysfunction. The research included 122 patients with Mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction, and explored the inter−rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, content validity and construct validity of the results among the participants. The results demonstrated that the inter−rater reliability coefficients for each dimension (except for the food choice dimension) were all above 0.8, and the overall internal consistency Cronbach's α value reached 0.971. The construct validity analysis showed that the scale was significantly correlated with swallowing function assessment tools such as the Kubota Water Swallowing Test and the EAT−10 scale. Three common factors were extracted: psychosocial function, nutritional intake patterns, and physiological function regulation (cumulative variance contribution rate of 72.742%), revealing the multidimensional impact of dysphagia on patients' psychological, physiological, and social functions. Research indicates that the Chinese version of the SWAL−QOL scale can serve as a reliable assessment tool for swallowing−related quality of life in patients with Mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction, providing theoretical support for the development of individualized intervention strategies and the enhancement of patients' quality of life.

Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL−QOL)  /  cognitive dysfunction  /  dysphagia  /  reliability  /  validity  /  quality of life assessment
Yixuan WANG, Yuchen QIAO, Kun YANG, Zhe CHEN, Yi TANG, Qi QIN. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SWAL−QOL questionnaire in patients with cognitive dysfunction[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2025 , 43 (20) : 115 -124 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2025.03.00126
Year 2025 volume 43 Issue 20
PDF
948
446
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2025.03.00126
  • Receive Date:2025-03-21
  • Online Date:2025-12-29
  • Published:2025-10-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-21
  • Revised:2025-07-15
Funding
Affiliations
    1Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders & Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing 100053, China
    2Department of Neurology, Rizhao Municipal Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Rizhao 276800, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2025.03.00126
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT