收藏切换
Comparison of American, Australian, and Chinese environmental regulations in the rare earth industry and implications for global sustainable development
收藏切换
PDF
Science & Technology Review | 2022, 40(8) : 78 - 90
Less
收藏切换
Science & Technology Review | 2022, 40(8): 78-90
Exclusive:Sustainable development strategy of rare earth resources
Comparison of American, Australian, and Chinese environmental regulations in the rare earth industry and implications for global sustainable development
Full
HUANG Qishen1,2, SUN Ying1, WANG Peng2,3, WANG Lu3, CHEN Weiqiang2,3,4
Affiliations
    1. School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China;
    3. Ganjiang Innovation Academy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou 341100, China;
    4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Published: 2022-04-28 doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.08.008
Outline
收藏切换
With increasing environmental pollution caused by the rare earth production, the environmental regulations are the key to the sustainable development and the international competitiveness of the rare earth industry in China. This paper reviews the development of the environmental regulations in China, the United States and Australia and compares some key aspects, including the safety management of the radioactive pollutants, the land reclamation, the air pollution management and the environmental taxes, and the main findings are as follows. (1) In China, the system of the environmental laws and regulations for the rare earth industry has been gradually established since 2012, containing effectively the spread of the environmental pollution, while somehow affecting the supply of the rare earths. (2) In the United States and Australia, regulations were established earlier, as high environmental barriers for the production of the rare earths. Accordingly, the producers of the rare earths and the related downstream industries shifted their business to other countries, which poses challenges for the United States and Australia to restore their production of the rare earths. (3) To reduce the high cost caused by the environmental regulations, based on the international trade, the United States and Australia have established three channels of transferring the environmental pollution, i.e., the production capacity transfer, the decree transfer and the production pattern transfer. As a result, countries such as Malaysia were driven to undertake severe environmental costs. Based on these international perspectives, we highlight the importance of the lessons learned in other countries such as the United States and Australia, and the improvement of the measures for regulating the rare earth industry in China and the global rare earth environmental governance system, in order to reduce the environmental pollution and to rationally optimize the global supply chain of the rare earths.
environmental regulations  /  environmental management  /  pollution transfer  /  rare earths
HUANG Qishen, SUN Ying, WANG Peng, WANG Lu, CHEN Weiqiang. Comparison of American, Australian, and Chinese environmental regulations in the rare earth industry and implications for global sustainable development[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022 , 40 (8) : 78 -90 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.08.008
Year 2022 volume 40 Issue 8
PDF
976
100
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.08.008
  • Receive Date:2021-12-28
  • Online Date:2022-06-10
  • Published:2022-04-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2021-12-28
  • Revised:2022-04-05
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.08.008
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT