收藏切换
Analysis and comparison of comprehensive risk index of COVID-19 in China and Hubei province
收藏切换
PDF
YUAN Hongyong, CHEN Tao, HUANG Lida, SU Guofeng, HUANG Quanyi, DAI Jiakun, YU Shuiping
Science & Technology Review | 2020, 38(4) : 21 - 28
Less
收藏切换
Science & Technology Review | 2020, 38(4): 21-28
Exclusive: COVID-19
Analysis and comparison of comprehensive risk index of COVID-19 in China and Hubei province
Full
YUAN Hongyong, CHEN Tao, HUANG Lida, SU Guofeng, HUANG Quanyi, DAI Jiakun, YU Shuiping
Affiliations
Published: 2020-02-28 doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.04.003
Outline
收藏切换
The comprehensive risk assessment of COVID-19 is a key approach to the comprehensive epidemic risk management while the assessment method is the key to the epidemic risk assessment. This paper uses the public security "triangular model" and considers the three factors, i.e., the incident(the hazard of the virus itself), the vulnerability of hazard-affected carriers(the vulnerability of vulnerable groups), and the effectiveness of emergency management to establish a multidimensional risk assessment method, which can help to provide effective method for the next epidemic response and plans of resource allocation. According to the assessment results, the top five provinces with highest comprehensive risk are respectively Hubei, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Beijing and Guangdong. Within Hubei province, the top four cities are Wuhan, E'zhou, Xiaogan and Huanggang.
COVID-19  /  public security  /  emergency ability
袁宏永, 陈涛, 黄丽达, 苏国锋, 黄全义, 戴佳昆, 余水平. 全国及湖北省新冠肺炎综合风险指数分析及比较. 科技导报, 2020 , 38 (4) : 21 -28 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.04.003
YUAN Hongyong, CHEN Tao, HUANG Lida, SU Guofeng, HUANG Quanyi, DAI Jiakun, YU Shuiping. Analysis and comparison of comprehensive risk index of COVID-19 in China and Hubei province[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2020 , 38 (4) : 21 -28 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.04.003
Year 2020 volume 38 Issue 4
PDF
505
158
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.04.003
  • Receive Date:2020-02-05
  • Online Date:2020-04-01
  • Published:2020-02-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2020-02-05
  • Revised:2020-02-25
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.04.003
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT