收藏切换
On defending effects of different forest belt structures in Ulan Buh Desert
收藏切换
PDF
Science & Technology Review | 2016, 34(18) : 125 - 129
Less
收藏切换
Science & Technology Review | 2016, 34(18): 125-129
• Articles •
On defending effects of different forest belt structures in Ulan Buh Desert
Full
Affiliations
Published: 2016-09-28 doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2016.18.016
Outline
收藏切换
According to observations on wind velocities of different shelterbelts in Ulan Buh Desert, the paper shows that the defending effect varies with forest belt structure, height and porosity. Wind defending effect of sparse structure shelterbelt is the best, which is 41.37%, porous structure takes the second place, 29.58%, and ventilation structure is the worst, 23.92%. Shelterbelt with a porosity of 40%~50% has the best wind defending effect. With the increase of porosity, the defending effect decreases remarkably. So the structure should be sparse with a porosity of 30%~50%, and the porosity of forest canopy should be 30%~50% and the porosity of trunk, 50%.
Ulan Buh Desert  /  defending effect  /  porosity
段娜, 刘芳, 徐军, 陈海玲, 张格, 郝玉光. 乌兰布和沙漠不同结构防护林带防风效能. 科技导报, 2016 , 34 (18) : 125 -129 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2016.18.016
DUAN Na, LIU Fang, XU Jun, CHEN Hailing, ZHANG Ge, HAO Yuguang. On defending effects of different forest belt structures in Ulan Buh Desert[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2016 , 34 (18) : 125 -129 . DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2016.18.016
Year 2016 volume 34 Issue 18
PDF
551
129
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2016.18.016
  • Receive Date:2015-09-17
  • Online Date:2016-10-21
  • Published:2016-09-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2015-09-17
  • Revised:2016-07-18
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/EN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2016.18.016
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT