Science & Technology Review
|
2015, 33(16): 88-94
• Focus •
Historical evolution, incompatibility arguments and suggestions on “eighteen incompatible medicaments”
Full
OU Lina1,2, ZHONG Gansheng1, LIU Haiyan1, CHEN Shaohong1, LIU Jia1
Affiliations
1. School of Preclinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Medical College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
Published: 2015-08-28
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.16.014
Outline
This paper reviews the antagonism theory and "eighteen incompatible medicaments", as well as the relevant provisions about them in the Pharmacopoeia of China. It provides suggestions for further research concerning the "eighteen incompatible medicaments" through analysis of their historical evolution and the status quo. The incompatibility arguments of the "eighteen incompatible medicaments" are discussed from aspects of literature review, experimental studies and clinical reports. It is found that clinical studies focus on retrospective summary of clinical reports, analyzing clinical safety evaluation and rules of compatible applications. Experimental studies are mostly carried out from aspects of chemical material foundation, pharmacology and toxicology.
"eighteen incompatible medicaments"
/
compatibility of traditional Chinese medicine
/
incompatibility arguments
欧丽娜, 钟赣生, 柳海艳, 陈绍红, 刘佳.
中药“十八反”的历史沿革、宜忌争论与思考建议.
科技导报,
2015
, 33
(16)
: 88
-94
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.16.014
OU Lina, ZHONG Gansheng, LIU Haiyan, CHEN Shaohong, LIU Jia.
Historical evolution, incompatibility arguments and suggestions on “eighteen incompatible medicaments”[J].
Science & Technology Review,
2015
, 33
(16)
: 88
-94
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.16.014
Year 2015 volume 33 Issue 16
PDF
747
70
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.16.014
- Receive Date:2015-03-19
- Online Date:2015-08-28
- Published:2015-08-28