收藏切换
Methodological study on topic modeling based on hospital needlestick injury reports: comparison of LDA and BERTopic in risk identification and management decision support
收藏切换
Tingfen CAO, Chao YAN, Tao ZHONG, Ting JIANG
Chinese Nursing Research | 2026, 40(17) : 3068 - 3073
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Nursing Research | 2026, 40(17): 3068-3073
• Original Articles •
Methodological study on topic modeling based on hospital needlestick injury reports: comparison of LDA and BERTopic in risk identification and management decision support
Full
Tingfen CAO, Chao YAN, Tao ZHONG, Ting JIANG
Affiliations
  • 1Guizhou Aerospace Hospital, Guizhou 563000 China
Published: 2026-09-10 doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.17.016
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

Taking the hospital needlestick injury report as the application scenario,to construct a comprehensive assessment framework of "theme quality-interpretability-action transformation-technical characteristics" to compare the potential Dirichlet scores,the differences between the two topic modeling methods,LDA and the Deep Learning Topic Framework Based on Pre-trained Language Models(BERTopic),in risk identification and management decision support,and input the theme-driven intervention suggestions.

Methods

A total of 160 needlestick injury reports were collected from a tertiary hospital between January 2018 and September 2025.After preprocessing including Chinese word segmentation,stop-word removal,and synonym merging,LDA and BERTopic models were trained separately.Model comparison was conducted using topic coherence,expert blind evaluation,and technical indicators such as training time,parameter sensitivity,and degree of automation.The resulting topics were then mapped onto a tiered intervention framework to formulate actionable countermeasures.

Results

Both models identified key risk scenarios including blood specimen collection, needle withdrawal/needle handling,and complex procedures in special departments.LDA generated five macro-level topics,suitable for rapid overview and routine monitoring.BERTopic generated four semantically coherent topics and one noise cluster, which more clearly delineated actionable scenarios such as blood collection chain risks among intern nurses,systemic failure in post-needle processing,and exposure in high-infection-risk cases.The topic coherence scores for BERTopic and LDA were 0.587 and 0.452, respectively.The overall expert rating scores were 4.555 and 3.944,respectively.Training times were 182 seconds and 45 seconds,respectively.

Conclusion

BERTopic demonstrates superior advantages in semantic depth and action translatability, making it suitable for root cause analysis and targeted improvement initiatives.LDA is better suited for rapid daily screening and trend monitoring.This study recommends a tiered application strategy of "routine LDA monitoring plus periodic BERTopic deep dives" in hospitals.The topic results can be transformed into structured interventions and evaluation indicators targeting populations,workflows,and devices,thereby forming a closed-loop management cycle of risk identification-intervention-review.

needlestick injury  /  topic modeling  /  latent Dirichlet allocation(LDA)  /  BERTopic  /  medical safety  /  incident reports  /  methodology
曹廷芬, 晏超, 钟涛, 蒋婷. 基于医院针刺伤报告的主题建模方法学研究:LDA与BERTopic用于风险识别与管理决策支持的比较. 护理研究, 2026 , 40 (17) : 3068 -3073 . DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.17.016
Tingfen CAO, Chao YAN, Tao ZHONG, Ting JIANG. Methodological study on topic modeling based on hospital needlestick injury reports: comparison of LDA and BERTopic in risk identification and management decision support[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2026 , 40 (17) : 3068 -3073 . DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.17.016
Year 2026 volume 40 Issue 17
47
21
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.17.016
  • Receive Date:2025-12-23
  • Online Date:2026-10-30
  • Published:2026-09-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-23
  • Revised:2026-07-14
Affiliations
    1Guizhou Aerospace Hospital, Guizhou 563000 China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/hlyj/EN/10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.17.016
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT