Full
Outline
Based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments(COSMIN) guidelines,this study systematically evaluated the methodological quality and measurement properties of assessment tools for post-stroke cognitive impairment(PSCI),aiming to identify high-quality evaluation tools.
A computerized search was conducted in PubMed,Web of Science,MedLine,CINAHL,EMbase,Cochrane Library,Scopus,CNKI,WanFang Database,VIP,and the China Biology Medicine(CBM) database for literature related to the psychometric evaluation of PSCI assessment tools.The retrieval period spanned from the establishment of the database to March 6,2025.Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data.Methodological risk of bias and quality of measurement properties were assessed using the COSMIN guidelines.The GRADE evidence grading system was applied to classify evidence levels,ultimately formulating recommendation levels.
A total of 22 studies were included,covering 10 PSCI assessment tools:the Oxford Cognitive Screen(OCS),Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE),Cognitive Assessment Scale for Post-Stroke Patients(CASP),Birmingham Cognitive Screen(BCoS),Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA),National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network(NINDS-CSN),Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition(BASIC),Mild Vascular Cognitive Impairment(MVCI) assessment tool,Barrow Neurological Institute Screen for Higher Cerebral Functions(BNIS) and Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified(TICS-M).MMSE received grade A recommendation,while the remaining 9 tools were classified as grade B recommendations.
The MMSE was classified as a grade A recommendation and could be temporarily recommended until better evidence emerges.However,its methodological quality requires improvement,and its measurement properties need further validation.
50
23
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
