收藏切换
Comparison of pesticide maximum residue limits in food between China and the Codex Alimentarius Commission
收藏切换
Shu-Cai LI, Chun-Yan FU, Wei-Qun LIU, Dan LUO, Ting CHEN, Nan HE, Jia ZHOU, Yu-Hang MIN, Xiao-Qin YU, Gui-Hong CHENG*
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(2) : 309 - 317
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(2): 309-317
• Food Safety Supervision and Management •
Comparison of pesticide maximum residue limits in food between China and the Codex Alimentarius Commission
Full
Shu-Cai LI, Chun-Yan FU, Wei-Qun LIU, Dan LUO, Ting CHEN, Nan HE, Jia ZHOU, Yu-Hang MIN, Xiao-Qin YU, Gui-Hong CHENG*
Affiliations
  • Sichuan Institute of Food Inspection, Key Laboratory of Baiiu Supervising Technology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Chengdu 611731, China
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250917006
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To systematically compare the differences in pesticide maximum residue limits (MRLs) between China and the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC).

Methods

Through comprehensive review and comparison of food classification systems, pesticide varieties, MRLs formulation principles, MRLs vlue differences and distribution, this study analyzed the internationalization level of China’s current standards and compared the overall differences in MRLs between China’s and CAC’s standards across various product categories.

Results

The 78.6% of the MRLs in China’s standards were consistent with those of the CAC. However, discrepancies remain:CAC employed a more sophisticated classification system (incorporating feed management and coding protocols). In terms of MRLs stringency, China’s limits were higher than CAC’s in 9.7% of cases (625 items), primarily involving vegetables and fruits, with 72.8% of these differences falling within a fivefold range. Conversely, China’s limits were lower than CAC’s in 8.6% of cases (554 items), including 2.2% with over 100-fold differences-variations principally attributable to China’s intensive agricultural practices, vegetable-dominant dietary patterns and distinct risk assessment methodologies.

Conclusion

China’s current standards demonstrate a high degree of alignment with those of the CAC. Furthermore, for specific commodities, China has established more granular MRLs, which are overall more stringent than their CAC counterparts. Based on these findings, the study recommends prioritizing international harmonization of high-risk pesticide MRLs, promoting the global adoption of China’s standards, and optimizing the alignment of China’s classification system with international frameworks to facilitate agricultural trade.

pesticide  /  maximum residue limits  /  Codex Alimentarius Commission  /  China
李澍才, 伏春彦, 刘魏群, 罗丹, 陈婷, 何楠, 周佳, 闵宇航, 余晓琴, 成桂红. 我国与国际食品法典委员会食品中农药最大残留限量的比对研究. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2026 , 17 (2) : 309 -317 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250917006
Shu-Cai LI, Chun-Yan FU, Wei-Qun LIU, Dan LUO, Ting CHEN, Nan HE, Jia ZHOU, Yu-Hang MIN, Xiao-Qin YU, Gui-Hong CHENG. Comparison of pesticide maximum residue limits in food between China and the Codex Alimentarius Commission[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2026 , 17 (2) : 309 -317 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250917006
Year 2026 volume 17 Issue 2
12
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250917006
  • Receive Date:2025-09-17
  • Online Date:2026-11-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-09-17
Funding
Affiliations
    Sichuan Institute of Food Inspection, Key Laboratory of Baiiu Supervising Technology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Chengdu 611731, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250917006
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT