收藏切换
Whole-life-cycle carbon assessment and economic analysis of a biomass gasification coupled co-firing power generation system
收藏切换
PDF
Thermal Power Generation |
Less
收藏切换
Thermal Power Generation |
• •
Whole-life-cycle carbon assessment and economic analysis of a biomass gasification coupled co-firing power generation system
Full
Affiliations
About Author:
doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202605016
Outline
收藏切换

[Objective] Biomass gasification-coupled co-firing is a feasible low-carbon retrofit route for existing coal-fired units. This study evaluates the carbon reduction effect and economic performance of a biomass gasification-coupled co-firing power system based on a 640 MW coal-fired unit. The effects of different co-firing ratios are examined at 70%, 50%, and 30% load, so as to provide a basis for low-carbon upgrading of large coalfired power plants, flexible power system operation, and future engineering practice. 

[Methods] A framework integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) was built. Pure-coal cases and biomass gasification-coupled co-firing cases were compared under different loads and co-firing ratios. The system boundary included fuel supply, biomass gasification, coupled combustion, power generation, auxiliary material use, and emission control. Fossil-based CO2 emission intensity was used to assess the direct carbon reduction caused by biomass substitution, while global warming potential (GWP) was used to measure life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Economic performance was assessed by levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and electricity profit. Biochar revenue and carbon trading revenue were also included to test their effects on system profitability. 

[Results] The results show that biomass gasification-coupled co-firing can greatly reduce the overall fossil-based CO2 emission intensity of the system. Compared with the corresponding pure-coal cases, the 15% co-firing cases reduce fossil-based CO2 emissions by 16.9%, 11.5%, and 10.9% at 70%, 50%, and 30% load, respectively. Contribution analysis shows that direct combustion is still the main emission source, accounting for about 60%~70% of total emissions. Thus, the overall emission reduction is mainly driven by the substitution of fossil coal with biomassderived syngas. In terms of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, the GWP of CO70-15, CO50-15, and CO30-15 decreases by 17.3%, 15.1%, and 17.8%, respectively, compared with the corresponding pure-coal benchmarks. 

[Conclusion] Economically, the coupled system generally has a higher LCOE than the pure-coal benchmark because of added biomass supply, gasification, and system integration costs. However, when biochar revenue and carbon trading revenue are included, electricity profit rises with the co-firing ratio. Overall, biomass gasification-coupled co-firing can reduce fossil-based CO2 emissions and life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, while showing a certain level of economic feasibility for large coal-fired units in practice. These findings further indicate that the proposed system can support low-carbon retrofitting of coal-fired power plants when biomass use, by-product recovery, and carbon market mechanisms are jointly considered.

. 生物质气化耦合掺烧发电系统全生命周期碳评价与经济性分析. 热力发电, : - . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202605016
. Whole-life-cycle carbon assessment and economic analysis of a biomass gasification coupled co-firing power generation system[J]. Thermal Power Generation, : - . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202605016
Year volume Issue
PDF
37
7
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202605016
  • Online Date:2026-07-24
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Affiliations

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlfd/EN/10.19666/j.rlfd.202605016
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT