收藏切换
A cost analysis and collaborative cost-reduction framework for CCS in coal-fired power plants
收藏切换
PDF
Dongpo MEN1, Dalin JIANG1, Ning WEI2, Shengnan LIU2
Thermal Power Generation | 2026, 55(6) : 28 - 38
Less
收藏切换
Thermal Power Generation | 2026, 55(6): 28-38
Technical and economic reciew
A cost analysis and collaborative cost-reduction framework for CCS in coal-fired power plants
Full
Dongpo MEN1, Dalin JIANG1, Ning WEI2, Shengnan LIU2
Affiliations
  • 1.China Energy Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
  • 2.State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
Published: 2026-06-25 doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202510028
Outline
收藏切换
[Objective]

Against the dual backdrop of urgent global climate governance and low-carbon transformation demands of the coal-fired power industry, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is widely recognized as a critical pathway to deep emission reduction in the power system. However, the high cost of CCS technology has severely hindered its large-scale promotion. To address this cost optimization challenge, this study aims to systematically explore the cost-driven mechanisms of the full-chain CCS system, identify key influencing factors, and propose a targeted cost-reduction paradigm, providing theoretical and practical support for the scientific deployment and commercialization of CCS in coal-fired power plants.

[Methods]

This study adopted the ITEAM-CCUS quantitative evaluation model, covering the full-chain CCS and integrating three core modules: geological carbon storage assessment, techno-economic analysis, and source-sink matching optimization. A systematic multi-parameter sensitivity analysis was conducted based on a sample of 165 domestic coal-fired power plants. These samples were selected to represent different regional distributions, unit capacities, and operational conditions, ensuring the generalizability and reliability of the research results. The analysis focused on key technical, economic, and geological parameters, such as absorbent regeneration heat consumption, coal price, plant utilization hours, electricity price, transportation distance, and reservoir properties.

[Results]

The study revealed that the average levelized cost of the full-chain CCS is 303 yuan per ton of CO2. Among the four chains, the capture and compression stages account for over 80% of the total cost, emerging as the primary focus for cost reduction. Specifically, capture cost is most significantly influenced by absorbent regeneration heat consumption, coal price, and plant utilization hours, and reducing regeneration heat consumption through technological innovation or improving plant operational efficiency can effectively lower capture costs. Compression cost shows a strong correlation with electricity price. Pipeline transportation cost is constrained by transportation distance and economies of scale. Storage cost is extremely sensitive to geological parameters such as reservoir’s permeability coefficient, thickness, and depth-reservoirs with higher permeability, greater thickness, and moderate depth are more conducive to reducing drilling, injection, and monitoring costs.

[Conclusion]

Based on the quantitative findings, this study proposes a systematic “scale-geology-energy efficiency synergy” cost-reduction paradigm. The specific pathways include technological innovation for low-energy consumption in the capture stage, large-scale infrastructure sharing across the full-chain CCS, refined operation and management of the CCS system, and policy incentives. This research clarifies CCS cost structures and driving factors, providing a feasible framework for governments, enterprises, and research institutions. It offers important theoretical and practical reference for promoting large-scale, commercial CCS application in coal-fired power plants, advancing power system decarbonization, and supporting global climate governance.

coal-fired power plants  /  CCS  /  cost sensitivity  /  cost reduction paths  /  ITEAM-CCUS model
Dongpo MEN, Dalin JIANG, Ning WEI, Shengnan LIU. A cost analysis and collaborative cost-reduction framework for CCS in coal-fired power plants[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026 , 55 (6) : 28 -38 . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202510028
  • China Energy National Energy Group’s 2023 R&D Project “An Economic Study and Planning Framework for New Energy with Storage versus Coal-based Energy with CCS”(GJNY-23-104)
Year 2026 volume 55 Issue 6
PDF
504
215
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202510028
  • Receive Date:2025-10-15
  • Online Date:2026-08-14
  • Published:2026-06-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-15
  • Revised:2025-11-05
  • Accepted:2025-11-18
Funding
China Energy National Energy Group’s 2023 R&D Project “An Economic Study and Planning Framework for New Energy with Storage versus Coal-based Energy with CCS”(GJNY-23-104)
Affiliations
    1.China Energy Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
    2.State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlfd/EN/10.19666/j.rlfd.202510028
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT