收藏切换
Flow loss assessment for a supercritical carbon dioxide axial turbine stage
收藏切换
PDF
Lei ZHANG1, 2, Ze SHI1, 2, Weilin SHU3, Rui YANG3, Guoying YANG4, Qinghua DENG4
Thermal Power Generation | 2024, 53(1) : 134 - 144
Less
收藏切换
Thermal Power Generation | 2024, 53(1): 134-144
Thermal energy science research
Flow loss assessment for a supercritical carbon dioxide axial turbine stage
Full
Lei ZHANG1, 2, Ze SHI1, 2, Weilin SHU3, Rui YANG3, Guoying YANG4, Qinghua DENG4
Affiliations
  • 1.Guoneng Guohua (Beijing) Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
  • 2.CHN Energy New Energy Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
  • 3.Shanghai Turbine Works Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200240, China
  • 4.School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Published: 2024-01-25 doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202305063
Outline
收藏切换

In order to further investigate the loss mechanism in supercritical carbon dioxide turbines, the flow characteristics in a turbine stage were studied by numerical method. The losses in the passage of stator and rotor blades were decomposed, and the various loss values and their proportions were quantitatively calculated. The loss sequence of the supercritical carbon dioxide turbine stage was clarified. The results show that, the high density of supercritical carbon dioxide and low blade height result in a very large leakage loss in turbine stage. When the stage load coefficient is 0.93, the relative height of the stator clearance is 0.012 and the relative height of the rotor clearance is 0.010, the leakage loss accounts for 38.23% of the total loss, including 21.94% of the diaphragm seal leakage loss and 16.29% of the tip seal leakage loss. Except for leakage loss, when the average maximum thickness divided by chord length is 0.33 and the aspect ratio is 2.07 in stator passage, the profile loss is much higher than the endwall loss and trailing edge loss, accounting for 9.68% of the total loss. In rotor passage, when the average maximum thickness divided by chord length is 0.28 and the aspect ratio is 1.73, the difference among endwall loss, profile loss, and trailing edge loss is not significant, and the profile loss has the highest proportion, accounting for 15.39% of the total loss. The influence range of secondary flow in rotor is even wider, and its endwall loss is much higher than that of the stator. The main sources of endwall loss are viscous dissipation of fluid near the end wall and secondary loss caused by horseshoe vortices, passage vortices, etc. The research results will provide direction guidance and data support for the design and optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide turbines.

carbon dioxide  /  turbine stage  /  entropy generation rate  /  flow loss
Lei ZHANG, Ze SHI, Weilin SHU, Rui YANG, Guoying YANG, Qinghua DENG. Flow loss assessment for a supercritical carbon dioxide axial turbine stage[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2024 , 53 (1) : 134 -144 . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202305063
  • Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China(U20A20303)
  • National Key Research and Development Program(2017YFB0601804)
Year 2024 volume 53 Issue 1
PDF
161
74
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202305063
  • Receive Date:2023-05-13
  • Online Date:2025-12-25
  • Published:2024-01-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-05-13
Funding
Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China(U20A20303)
National Key Research and Development Program(2017YFB0601804)
Affiliations
    1.Guoneng Guohua (Beijing) Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
    2.CHN Energy New Energy Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
    3.Shanghai Turbine Works Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200240, China
    4.School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlfd/EN/10.19666/j.rlfd.202305063
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT