收藏切换
Research on modeling of GTCC-SOEC hydrogen-production energy storage system coupled with deep peak-shaving
收藏切换
PDF
Yifeng WANG, Junfeng XIAO, Mengqi HU, Lin XIA, Xiaolong LIAN, Zongli SHI
Thermal Power Generation | 2026, 55(2) : 158 - 169
Less
收藏切换
Thermal Power Generation | 2026, 55(2): 158-169
Multi-type energy storage-assisted peak and frequency regulation technology
Research on modeling of GTCC-SOEC hydrogen-production energy storage system coupled with deep peak-shaving
Full
Yifeng WANG, Junfeng XIAO, Mengqi HU, Lin XIA, Xiaolong LIAN, Zongli SHI
Affiliations
  • Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China
Published: 2026-02-25 doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202506112
Outline
收藏切换

A model for hydrogen production and storage during deep peak-shaving (less than 30% of rated capacity) was established by coupling a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) unit with a solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC), demonstrating the feasibility of efficiently matching electrothermal resources within the system to accommodate renewable energy. Machine learning was used to predict GTCC variable-load power output, heat recovery boiler models were used to calculate steam parameters, and SOEC thermochemical models were applied to determine hydrogen production electricity and heat consumption. Results show that SOEC electrolysis voltage and hydrogen production can quickly respond to changes in input electrical energy, with the thermal inertia temperature difference of hydrogen production stabilizing at 25~27 ℃. When the peak shaving depth (the ratio of accommodated renewable energy to rated capacity) increased from 50% to 100%, the overall efficiency of the energy storage peak shaving system rose from 47.8% to 55.3%. Using GTCC-SOEC to accommodate renewable energy reduced the total energy consumption of hydrogen production from 6.7 kJ/m³ to 5.8 kJ/m³, with a reduction of 13.4%. SOEC hydrogen production heat consumption is about 80% of the electricity consumption, and the efficiency of the coupled hydrogen production system is only approximately 3.15%~3.34% lower than the efficiency of GTCC standalone peak-shaving power generation. For every 1% increase in peak shaving depth, hydrogen production increases by about 0.1 t/h, and CO2 emissions from natural gas combustion decrease by 0.64 t/h. Considering storage costs and weather impacts, when the unit operates for 8 hours per day, as the peak periods for wind and solar generation increase from 0 to 1.5 hours, the hydrogen blending volume ratio increases to 30%, and the average efficiency of the hydrogen storage-release cycle increases from the baseline 56.7% to 62.5%; When the daily online duration of renewable energy reaches 2.5 hours, the average efficiency within the cycle can reach 67.1%. When the ratio of peak-shaving subsidy to electricity price is less than 0.2, the cost-to-output ratio initially decreases and then increases with the ratio of stored to grid electricity. When the subsidy-to-electricity price ratio is greater than 0.2, the cost-to-output ratio continuously increases with the stored-to-grid electricity ratio.

combined cycle power generation  /  heat recovery steam generator  /  deep peak regulation  /  solid oxide electrolysis cell  /  dynamic modeling
Yifeng WANG, Junfeng XIAO, Mengqi HU, Lin XIA, Xiaolong LIAN, Zongli SHI. Research on modeling of GTCC-SOEC hydrogen-production energy storage system coupled with deep peak-shaving[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026 , 55 (2) : 158 -169 . DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202506112
  • Research on Key Technologies for Health Management of Heavy-duty Gas Turbines Based on Digital Twins (Supporting)(T1-25-TYK38)
Year 2026 volume 55 Issue 2
PDF
210
101
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202506112
  • Receive Date:2025-06-22
  • Online Date:2026-08-14
  • Published:2026-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-06-22
  • Revised:2025-07-18
  • Accepted:2025-07-28
Funding
Research on Key Technologies for Health Management of Heavy-duty Gas Turbines Based on Digital Twins (Supporting)(T1-25-TYK38)
Affiliations
    Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlfd/EN/10.19666/j.rlfd.202506112
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT