In order to select advanced technologies applicable to civil aircraft, technical characteristics from various fields were integrated to develop an evaluation framework. Five key evaluation dimensions were identified: technology competitiveness, technology readiness assessment, economic impact, engineering methods, and technology standards. From practical case studies, these dimensions were derived and used as the basis for an evaluation index system. A technology application perspective was adopted, utilizing a cloud model and a reverse cloud generator to determine indicator weights. This approach incorporated technical standards from different industries, airworthiness standards, and the entire life cycle of civil aircraft to create comprehensive evaluation guidelines. The results show that this approach effectively compares advanced technologies across different industries, differentiates similar technologies at various levels, and eliminates those that offer no benefit or are unsuitable for civil aircraft. This evaluation approach successfully selects advanced technologies with a high degree of compatibility with civil aircraft.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |