PDF
Full
Outline
OBJECTIVE To provide reference and guidance for improving the development mechanism and content of guidelines (general technical requirements) for similar content published by Chinese pharmacopoeia commission and drug regulatory agency. METHODS By reviewing the similar guidelines (general technical requirements) published by pharmacopoeia commissions and drug regulatory agencies in China, the United States, Europe, and Japan, a comparison and analysis were conducted on their similarities, differences, and mutual references in terms of their development purposes, scope of application, and specific content. RESULTS In terms of preparations, biological products, stability, impurities, dissolution, microbiological testing methods, and validation of analytical methods, pharmacopoeia commissions and drug regulatory agencies in China, the United States, Europe, and Japan have similar guidelines (general technical requirements), and there are differences in the purposes and focuses. Except for China, other countries or regions have less repetitive content and no conflicting content in the guidelines (general technical requirements) for similar content published by pharmacopoeia commissions and drug regulatory agencies. The two complement each other and jointly support the drug standard system. CONCLUSION It is recommended that China's drug regulatory agency take the lead in determining the subjects, further optimizing and improving the harmonization mechanism, and harmonizing and unifying the guidelines (general technical requirements) developed by pharmacopoeia commission and drug regulatory agency based on the functions of each agency, to ensure that the two are clearly positioned in terms of development purposes, scope of application, and content. Strengthen the interoperability of similar content guidelines published by pharmacopoeia agency and drug regulatory agency and keep pace with international standards.
PDF
138
67
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
