收藏切换
Quality Evaluation of Codonopsis pilosula in China
收藏切换
PDF
Pan WANG1, Fusong LIU2, Delin ZHANG2, Jie PENG2, Sha LIU2, *, Faming WU2, *
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal | 2024, 59(23) : 2226 - 2240
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal | 2024, 59(23): 2226-2240
Quality Evaluation of Codonopsis pilosula in China
Full
Pan WANG1, Fusong LIU2, Delin ZHANG2, Jie PENG2, Sha LIU2, *, Faming WU2, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Gansu Health Vocational College, Lanzhou 730207, China
  • 2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China
Published: 2024-12-08 doi: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
Outline
收藏切换

OBJECTIVE To provide reference for reasonable protection, development and utilization of Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources. METHODS Variation analysis, correlation analysis, principal components analysis, cluster analysis, piecewise linear regression analysis, and stepwise multiple regression analysis were conducted on the main agronomic traits and representative components of 106 Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources. RESULTS The genetic variability of the 106 Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources was rich, with the coefficients of variation of the 106 Codonopsis pilosula trait indexes ranging from 9.331% to 86.948%, among which the coefficient of variation of the degree of variability of atractylenolide Ⅲ was the highest, 86.948%; the indexes of genetic diversity ranged from 1.587 to 2.039, with syringin 1.587, and root length, number of branches, and Codonopsis polysaccharide were 2.027,2.039 and 2.032, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that most of the 14 traits had significant or highly significant relationships with each other. The seven principal component factors available for principal component analysis could explain most of the information of the 14 indicators, with eigenvalues of 4.172, 2.427, 1.646, 1.196, 0.943, 0.872 and 0.75, respectively, and the cumulative contribution rate reached 85.760%. Using the DTOPSIS method to score the germplasm resources of Codonopsis pilosula, the top 15 were No.13, No.20, No.21, No.18, No.73, No.77, No.90, No.78, No.88, No.72, No.74, No.80, No.79, No.34 and No.14, respectively.Clustering analysis showed that 106 codonopsis germplasm could be classified into five taxa, among which the agronomic traits and quality indexes except syringin at a higher level in taxon Ⅰ. The overall performance was better, and it could be promoted for cultivation. stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that root length, luxia diameter, dry weight, drying rate, total amino acid, tryptophan, tangshenoside Ⅰ and atractylenolide Ⅲ had significant effects on fresh weight. Root length, total amino acid. Codonopsis polysaccharide, tryptophan, syringin, tangshenoside Ⅰ and atractylenolide Ⅲ had significant effects on extractum. Extractum had significant effects on codonopsis polysaccharide. Total amino acids, tryptophan and syringin had significant effects on lobetyolin. CONCLUSION The results of this study can serve as a reference for screening high-quality germplasm resources and cultivating varieties of Codonopsis pilosula.

Codonopsis Radix  /  agronomic trait  /  representative component  /  principal components analysis  /  comprehensive evaluation
Pan WANG, Fusong LIU, Delin ZHANG, Jie PENG, Sha LIU, Faming WU. Quality Evaluation of Codonopsis pilosula in China[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2024 , 59 (23) : 2226 -2240 . DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
Year 2024 volume 59 Issue 23
PDF
112
51
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
  • Receive Date:2024-05-16
  • Online Date:2025-11-13
  • Published:2024-12-08
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-05-16
Funding
Affiliations
    1 Gansu Health Vocational College, Lanzhou 730207, China
    2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN/10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT