收藏切换
Comparative Study on the Determination Method of Entrapment Efficiency of Alprostadil Injection
收藏切换
PDF
Yulong DUAN1, 2, 3, 4, Longshan ZHAO1, *
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal | 2025, 60(2) : 166 - 171
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal | 2025, 60(2): 166-171
Comparative Study on the Determination Method of Entrapment Efficiency of Alprostadil Injection
Full
Yulong DUAN1, 2, 3, 4, Longshan ZHAO1, *
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
  • 2 Shijiazhuang Si yao Group Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • 3 Chemical Sterile Preparation Industry Technology Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • 4 Hebei Province High Capacity Injection Engineering Technology Research Center, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
Published: 2025-01-22 doi: 10.11669/cpj.2025.02.008
Outline
收藏切换

OBJECTIVE To establish a method for determining the entrapment efficiency of alprostadil injection, compare the differences between ultrafiltration centrifugation and microcolumn centrifugation methods for determining the entrapment efficiency of alprostadil injection, and select the optimal method. METHODS High pressure homogenization method was used to prepare alprostadil injection. Ultrafiltration membrane with different molecular weights were used to establish the ultrafiltration centrifugation method by selecting the centrifugation speed and time. The micro column was prepared with Sephadex G-50, and the encapsulated and free drugs were separated by centrifugal elution. The separation effect was evaluated by establishing the elution curve of soybean oil and free alprostadil. At the same time, the difference between different elution solvents was investigated, the optimal elution solvent was screened, and the microcolumn centrifugation method was established. The drug content was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and post column derivatization device, and the entrapment efficiency was calculated. RESULTS The entrapment efficiency of three batches of alprostadil injection measured by ultrafiltration centrifugation method ranged from 98.6% to 99.5%, while the entrapment efficiency measured by microcolumn centrifugation method ranged from 89.5% to 91.3%. CONCLUSION The results of the ultrafiltration centrifugation method for determining the entrapment efficiency are too high and not suitable for the determination of the entrapment efficiency of this product. The microcolumn centrifugation method using glycerol aqueous solution as the eluting solvent is suitable for the determination of the entrapment efficiency of this product.

alprostadil injection  /  entrapment efficiency  /  ultrafiltration centrifugation method  /  microcolumn centrifugation method
Yulong DUAN, Longshan ZHAO. Comparative Study on the Determination Method of Entrapment Efficiency of Alprostadil Injection[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2025 , 60 (2) : 166 -171 . DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2025.02.008
Year 2025 volume 60 Issue 2
PDF
150
71
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11669/cpj.2025.02.008
  • Receive Date:2023-08-17
  • Online Date:2025-11-08
  • Published:2025-01-22
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-08-17
Affiliations
    1 School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
    2 Shijiazhuang Si yao Group Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    3 Chemical Sterile Preparation Industry Technology Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    4 Hebei Province High Capacity Injection Engineering Technology Research Center, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN/10.11669/cpj.2025.02.008
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT