收藏切换
Study on Soil Consolidation Efficiency of 9 Common Ground Cover Plants Based on Landscape Slope Protection
收藏切换
PDF
Weiwen XIE, Tengfang XIE, Bingmin LI, Kailang GUAN, Guangwen TAN*
Chinese Landscape Architecture | 2026, 42(3) : 100 - 106
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Landscape Architecture | 2026, 42(3): 100-106
LA Ecological
Study on Soil Consolidation Efficiency of 9 Common Ground Cover Plants Based on Landscape Slope Protection
Full
Weiwen XIE, Tengfang XIE, Bingmin LI, Kailang GUAN, Guangwen TAN*
Affiliations

    XIE Weiwen, male, born in 1996 in Maoming, Guangdong Province, Assistant Engineer in Guangzhou Pubang Landscape Architecture Co., Ltd., research area: landscape plant application and ecology (Guangzhou 510627)

    XIE Tengfang, female, born in 1984 in Boluo, Guangdong Province, Chief Engineer of Research Institute and Senior Engineer in Guangzhou Pubang Landscape Architecture Co., Ltd., research area: landscape architecture (Guangzhou 510627)

    LI Bingmin, female, born in 1992 in Chaozhou, Guangdong Province, Senior Engineer in Guangzhou Pubang Landscape Architecture Co., Ltd., research area: landscape plant application and ecology (Guangzhou 510627)

    GUAN Kailang, male, born in 1988 in Yangjiang, Guangdong Province, Intermediate Engineer in Guangzhou Pubang Landscape Architecture Co., Ltd., research area: ecology (Guangzhou 510627)

    TAN Guangwen, male, born in 1959 in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, Group Chief Expert and Professor-level Senior Engineer in Guangzhou Pubang Landscape Architecture Co., Ltd., research area: park management, planning and design, landscape plant (Guangzhou 510627)

Published: 2026-03-10 doi: 10.19775/j.cla.2026.03.0100
Outline
收藏切换

To screen herbaceous plants that are adaptable to and conducive to stabilizing ecologically fragile garden slopes, this study selected 9 commonly used herbaceous slope-protection plants from Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area, a renowned mountain scenic spot in South China, and conducted tests on the shear strength, anti-scourability, and anti-erosion resistance of their root-soil composites. The results showed that all the tested plants could effectively improve slope stability, and the ranking of their comprehensive soil-fixing efficiency was as follows: Axonopus compressus > Arrhenatherum elatius 'Variegatum' > Calathea insignis>Wedelia trilobata > Hymenocallis littoralis >Hemerocallis fulva > Nephrolepis cordifolia > Ruellia simplex > Pilea notata. In terms of specific performance indicators reflecting different aspects of soil stability, Arrhenatherum elatius 'Variegatum', Hymenocallis littoralis, and Nephrolepis cordifolia had the highest shear strength in the upper soil layer; Arrhenatherum elatius 'Variegatum', Hymenocallis littoralis, and Calathea insignis exhibited the best performance in the shear strength of the lower soil layer; in terms of anti-scourability, Axonopus compressus, Wedelia trilobata, and Hemerocallis fulva showed the optimal performance; meanwhile, Calathea insignis, Ruellia simplex, and Hemerocallis fulva demonstrated the strongest anti-erosion resistance. The comprehensive evaluation based on all test indicators indicated that Axonopus compressus, Arrhenatherum elatius 'Variegatum', Calathea insignis, Wedelia trilobata, and Hymenocallis littoralis are highly suitable as excellent slope-protection plants for garden slopes in Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area and South China. To accurately quantify the relative contribution rate of each evaluation index to the overall soil-fixing effect, the entropy weight method was adopted to measure the contribution degree of each index. The results revealed that the contribution rates followed the order: anti-scourability (33.44%) > upper-layer shear strength (26.03%) > lower-layer shear strength (21.31%) > anti-erosion resistance (19.22%), indicating that the importance of different indicators varied. The upper and lower-layer shear strengths are the core indicators reflecting the mechanical effects of root-soil composites, with the contribution rate of upper-layer shear strength being higher than that of the lower layer, while anti-scourability and anti-erosion resistance are the key indicators characterizing hydrological effects. Both mechanical and hydrological effects play significant and indispensable roles in the soil-fixing function of slope-protection plants. It is worth noting that the cumulative contribution rate of hydrological effect indicators reached 52.66%, which was equivalent to that of mechanical effect indicators (47.34%). Correlation analysis further revealed that there was a highly significant positive correlation (P<0.01) among upper-layer shear strength, lower-layer shear strength, and anti-erosion resistance, while anti-scourability was only highly significantly correlated with anti-erosion resistance (P<0.01). These findings collectively indicate that there is a clear synergistic mechanism between mechanical and hydrological effects during the soil-fixing process of slope-protection plants, and provide important theoretical support for the scientific selection of slope-protection plants in South China.

landscape architecture  /  slope protection  /  root reinforcement of soil  /  soil and water conservation  /  vegetative slope protection  /  Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area
Weiwen XIE, Tengfang XIE, Bingmin LI, Kailang GUAN, Guangwen TAN. Study on Soil Consolidation Efficiency of 9 Common Ground Cover Plants Based on Landscape Slope Protection[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2026 , 42 (3) : 100 -106 . DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2026.03.0100
Year 2026 volume 42 Issue 3
PDF
78
17
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19775/j.cla.2026.03.0100
  • Receive Date:2024-05-14
  • Online Date:2026-07-08
  • Published:2026-03-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-05-14
  • Revised:2024-12-27
Funding
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyl/EN/10.19775/j.cla.2026.03.0100
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT