收藏切换
Quality evaluation of Centella asiatica based on sensory characteristics and gray relational analysis
收藏切换
FU-song LIU1, Yao-yao LI1, Xu-qiang NIE1, Fa-ming WU1, 2, Jian XIE1
Chinese Journal of New Drugs | 2021, 30(20) : 1881 - 1889
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of New Drugs | 2021, 30(20): 1881-1889
Quality evaluation of Centella asiatica based on sensory characteristics and gray relational analysis
Full
FU-song LIU1, Yao-yao LI1, Xu-qiang NIE1, Fa-ming WU1, 2, Jian XIE1
Affiliations
  • 1Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550014, China
Published: 2021-10-30
Outline
收藏切换
Objective:

To comprehensively evaluate the quality of Centella asiatica by combining the sensory characteristics and gray relational analysis to improve the reliability and scientificity of the quality evaluation of Centella asiatica.

Methods:

The characteristics, microscopic structure and thin layer chromatography of Centella asiatica were identified by pharmacognosy methods; the impurity, moisture, total ash and extract content were determined with reference to the fourth general rule of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia; HPLC method was used to determine the contents of impurities, moisture, total ash and extracts of Centella asiatica. The contents of asiaticoside and madecassoside were determined; the gray relational analysis was used to construct the quality evaluation model of Centella asiatica, and the relative degree of correlation was calculated.

Results:

There were no significant differences in the characteristics and microscopic structure of Centella asiatica from different producing areas; thin layer chromatography could detect both asiaticoside and madecassoside; the impurity content was 0.500%~8.837%; the moisture content was 4.899%~6.423%; the total ash content was 10.103%~16.368%; the extract content was 28.100%~38.311%; the asiaticoside content was 0.383%~1.019%; the madecassoside content was 0.541%~1.915%. Combined with various factors such as impurities, moisture, total ash, extract, asiaticoside and madecassoside, it was indicated that the 29 batches of Centella asiatica from different producing areas had quality differences and their relative correlations degree values were in the range of 0.437~0.556. The top 3 samples are S15, S8, and S9, Centella asiatica produced in Xiajiang county, Ji'an city, Jiangxi province, the measured relative degree of correlation is larger, and the quality ranking is higher, indicating that the quality of Centella asiatica produced in Xiajiang county, Ji'an city, Jiangxi province is better.

Conclusion:

The quality evaluation model established by the sensory characteristics combined with gray relational analysis can be used for the quality evaluation of Centella asiatica from different producing areas.

Centella asiatica  /  gray relational analysis  /  microscopic structure  /  thin layer chromatography  /  asiaticoside  /  madecassoside
刘付松, 李尧尧, 聂绪强, 吴发明, 谢健. 基于感官特征结合灰色关联度法评价积雪草质量. 中国新药杂志, 2021 , 30 (20) : 1881 -1889 .
FU-song LIU, Yao-yao LI, Xu-qiang NIE, Fa-ming WU, Jian XIE. Quality evaluation of Centella asiatica based on sensory characteristics and gray relational analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2021 , 30 (20) : 1881 -1889 .
Year 2021 volume 30 Issue 20
29
5
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Online Date:2026-10-30
  • Published:2021-10-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Accepted:2021-05-07
Funding
Affiliations
    1Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, China
    2State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550014, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgxyzz/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT