收藏切换
Comparison of commonly used evaluation methods of dissolution curves and their advantages and disadvantages
收藏切换
Li MA1, Chuan-yong ZHU2, Xiao-lin HE2, Xiang-ning DUAN2, Zhi-chen GAO2, Zhao-yun LÜ2, De-jiang TAN1
Chinese Journal of New Drugs | 2021, 30(22) : 2091 - 2097
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of New Drugs | 2021, 30(22): 2091-2097
Comparison of commonly used evaluation methods of dissolution curves and their advantages and disadvantages
Full
Li MA1, Chuan-yong ZHU2, Xiao-lin HE2, Xiang-ning DUAN2, Zhi-chen GAO2, Zhao-yun LÜ2, De-jiang TAN1
Affiliations
  • 1National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 102629, China
  • 2Beijing Union Pharmaceutical Factory, Beijing 102629, China
Published: 2021-11-30
Outline
收藏切换
Objective:

To compare and analyze the performance of commonly used evaluation methods for dissolution curves, and explore more suitable alternative method when f2 factor cannot be used due to highly variable dissolution data.

Methods:

Taking bicyclol tablets as example, 20 batches of dissolution data were collected and compared using different evaluation methods, including model-independent methods, model-dependent difference test, and model-dependent equivalence test of the model parameters.

Results:

Among the several model-independent methods, the results of the f2-bootstrap method were closer to the f2 method than the multivariate statistic distance (MSD) method when the dissolution data had greater variation (>10%). The results of t-test and MSD for comparing the parameters of model-dependent method were significantly different with the f2 method. The tolerance intervals of each parameter obtained by using model parameters for the first time could be used as the equivalent interval of model parameters for evaluation of dissolution consistency in the future.

Conclusion:

When the f2 method is not applicable, the f2-bootstrap method can be used as an alternative method. The newly proposed equivalence interval of the model parameters can make up for the deficiency of t-test, and better evaluate the dissolution curves from the view of quality consistency.

dissolution curves  /  f2 factor  /  f2-bootstrap  /  multivariate statistic distance  /  model-dependent  /  equivalence interval
马莉, 祝传勇, 何小琳, 段湘宁, 高志晨, 吕昭云, 谭德讲. 溶出曲线的常见评价方法及优劣性探讨. 中国新药杂志, 2021 , 30 (22) : 2091 -2097 .
Li MA, Chuan-yong ZHU, Xiao-lin HE, Xiang-ning DUAN, Zhi-chen GAO, Zhao-yun LÜ, De-jiang TAN. Comparison of commonly used evaluation methods of dissolution curves and their advantages and disadvantages[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2021 , 30 (22) : 2091 -2097 .
Year 2021 volume 30 Issue 22
56
11
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2021-11-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Accepted:2021-08-18
Funding
Affiliations
    1National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 102629, China
    2Beijing Union Pharmaceutical Factory, Beijing 102629, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgxyzz/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT