收藏切换
Comparative analysis of chemical variability between root and vine of Actinidia chinensis Planch. based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS technique and plant metabolomics
收藏切换
Ya-qin ZHEN1, 2, 3, Xiang WANG1, 2, 3, Ning LI1, 2, 3, Le GAO1, 2, 3, Li-ying NIU1, 2, 3, Wei TIAN1, 2, 3, *, Xin-guo WANG1, 2, 3, *
Chinese Journal of New Drugs | 2026, 35(9) : 960 - 968
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of New Drugs | 2026, 35(9): 960-968
Comparative analysis of chemical variability between root and vine of Actinidia chinensis Planch. based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS technique and plant metabolomics
Full
Ya-qin ZHEN1, 2, 3, Xiang WANG1, 2, 3, Ning LI1, 2, 3, Le GAO1, 2, 3, Li-ying NIU1, 2, 3, Wei TIAN1, 2, 3, *, Xin-guo WANG1, 2, 3, *
Affiliations
  • 1Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050091, China
  • 2Hebei TCM Formula Granule Innovation Center, Shijiazhuang 050091, China
  • 3Hebei TCM Quality Evaluation & Standardization Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang 050091, China
Published: 2026-05-15 doi: 10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.09.009
Outline
收藏切换
Objective:

To establish a qualitative analytical method for the chemical constituents in the root and vine of Actinidia chinensis Planch, and to systematically compare the similarities and differences between them.

Methods:

LC-MS was performed in negative ion mode to acquire high-resolution mass-to-charge ratios and ion intensity data of the samples from the root and vine of Actinidia chinensis Planch. Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were applied to the preprocessed dataset to rapidly identify differential components between the two samples.

Results:

The chemical compositions of root and vine were similar, primarily consisting of triterpenoids, flavonoids and phenylpropanoids, but with certain differences in content. Multivariate analysis identified 31 differential components. The root showed higher contents of triterpenoids (e.g., asiatic acid) and flavonoids (e.g., catechin) than the vine, while five differential compounds, including fraxin and aesculetin, were relatively more abundant in the vine.

Conclusion:

This study clarifies the similarities and differences in chemical composition between the root and vine of Actinidia chinensis Planch. The admixture of vine into the root was found to compromise its quality. This study provides significant implications for ensuring the quality of root of Actinidia chinensis Planch., guiding clinical medication, and facilitating the medicinal development of both root and vine resources.

Actinidia chinensis Planch.  /  root  /  vine  /  UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS  /  chemical composition  /  quality evaluation
甄亚钦, 王相, 李宁, 高乐, 牛丽颖, 田伟, 王鑫国. 基于液质联用技术和植物代谢组学的猕猴桃根与猕猴桃藤的化学成分差异分析. 中国新药杂志, 2026 , 35 (9) : 960 -968 . DOI: 10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.09.009
Ya-qin ZHEN, Xiang WANG, Ning LI, Le GAO, Li-ying NIU, Wei TIAN, Xin-guo WANG. Comparative analysis of chemical variability between root and vine of Actinidia chinensis Planch. based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS technique and plant metabolomics[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2026 , 35 (9) : 960 -968 . DOI: 10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.09.009
Year 2026 volume 35 Issue 9
40
7
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.09.009
  • Online Date:2026-10-26
  • Published:2026-05-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Accepted:2025-06-27
Funding
Affiliations
    1Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050091, China
    2Hebei TCM Formula Granule Innovation Center, Shijiazhuang 050091, China
    3Hebei TCM Quality Evaluation & Standardization Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang 050091, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgxyzz/EN/10.20251/j.cnki.1003-3734.2026.09.009
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT