收藏切换
Clinical trial of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of gastric cancer
收藏切换
PDF
Ling SHEN, Xiao REN, Yao-sheng ZHANG, Xiu-li YANG
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2026, 42(9) : 1258 - 1263
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2026, 42(9): 1258-1263
Clinical and Basic Bridging Research
Clinical trial of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of gastric cancer
Full
Ling SHEN, Xiao REN, Yao-sheng ZHANG, Xiu-li YANG
Affiliations
  • Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang 473000, Henan Province, China
Published: 2026-05-17 doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.09.010
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of capecitabine tablets combined with oxaliplatin for injection (XELOX) in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with stage Ⅱ gastric cancer who underwent D2 radical surgery in the hospital were divided into control group and treatment group by the random number table method. Starting at 4 weeks postoperatively, the control group was administered tegifur capsules with dosage adjusted based on body surface area of 40 or 60 mg, taken twice daily for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week break, with each 21-day cycle repeated for 8 consecutive cycles. The treatment group received 130 mg·m-2 of intravenous oxaliplatin on the first postoperative day, followed by capecitabine tablets at 1 000 mg·m-2 per dose, twice daily from days 1 to 14, followed by a 1-week break, with each 21-day cycle repeated for 8 consecutive cycles. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), microRNA-34a (miR-34a), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups, and the safety evaluation was performed.

Results

A total of 150 patients were screened, and 130 cases were enrolled in the trial, including 65 cases in control group (with 5 dropouts) and 65 cases in treatment group (with 5 dropouts). Ultimately, 60 patients from each group were included in the statistical analysis. After 8 cycles of treatment, CEA levels in treatment group and control group were (4.83±1.22) and (6.33±1.14) ng·mL-1, CA19-9 levels were (24.33±3.58) and (28.86±4.18) U·mL-1, CA72-4 levels were (5.48±1.22) and (7.27±1.55) μg·L-1, the relative expression levels of miR-34a were 2.57±0.45 and 2.13±0.42, respectively. Compared with control group, the aforementioned indicators in treatment group showed statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The median DFS values in treatment group and control group were 56 and 48 months, respectively, and the difference in DFS survival curve between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05); the median OS values were 62 and 60 months, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Adverse drug reactions in treatment group included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and peripheral neurotoxicity, while those in control group included leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. The incidence rates of peripheral neurotoxicity in treatment group and control group were 6.67% (4 cases/60 cases) and 0% (0 cases /60 cases), the incidence rates of hand-foot syndrome were 21.67% (13 cases/60 cases) and 0% (0 cases/60 cases), the incidence rates of grade ≥ Ⅲ leukopenia were 16.67% (10 cases /60 cases) and 5.00% (3 cases /60 cases), the incidence rates of grade ≥ Ⅲ thrombocytopenia were 8.33% (5 cases /60 cases) and 0% (0 cases /60 cases), respectively. The incidence rates of the aforementioned adverse drug reactions in treatment group were statistically significantly different from those in control group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application of XELOX regimen as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage Ⅱ gastric cancer can effectively improve the levels of tumor markers and prolong the DFS, and has more obvious advantages compared to tegafur capsule gimeracil oteracil potassium single-drug regimen, but the adverse drug reactions are also more obvious.

capecitabine tablet  /  oxaliplatin for injection  /  gastric cancer  /  tumor marker  /  prognosis
Ling SHEN, Xiao REN, Yao-sheng ZHANG, Xiu-li YANG. Clinical trial of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin in the treatment of gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2026 , 42 (9) : 1258 -1263 . DOI: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.09.010
Year 2026 volume 42 Issue 9
PDF
166
24
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.09.010
  • Receive Date:2026-03-17
  • Online Date:2026-08-06
  • Published:2026-05-17
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-03-17
Affiliations
    Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang 473000, Henan Province, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zglcylxzz/EN/10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.09.010
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT