收藏切换
Bioequivalence study of propofol injectable emulsion in healthy Chinese volunteers
收藏切换
PDF
Shou-fei SUN1, Wen-xin LI2, Jiang-tao DONG3, Jing ZHANG3, Yan-jiao YANG4, Rui-xia LIU5
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2025, 41(1) : 86 - 90
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2025, 41(1): 86-90
Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Study
Bioequivalence study of propofol injectable emulsion in healthy Chinese volunteers
Full
Shou-fei SUN1, Wen-xin LI2, Jiang-tao DONG3, Jing ZHANG3, Yan-jiao YANG4, Rui-xia LIU5
Affiliations
  • 1.Shandong Cisen Fodu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jining 272500, Shandong Province, China
  • 2.Shandong Institute for Food and Drug Control, Jinan 250101, Shandong Province, China
  • 3.Cisen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jining 272073, Shandong Province, China
  • 4.Shandong Nuochen Beitong Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Jining 272073, Shandong Province, China
  • 5.Henan Zhonghui Hosptial, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
Published: 2025-01-17 doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.01.018
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of propofol injectable emulsion, and to assess the bioequivalence of test and reference formulations in healthy Chinese adult volunteers.

Methods

Thirty-two healthy Chinese adult volunteers were recruited and randomly assigned to a fasting. single-dose, two-period and double-crossover study. Propofol was given to eligible subjects at a speed of 30 μg·kg-1·min-1 for 30 min. The concentration of propofol in plasma was determined by avalidated high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometery (HPLC-MS/MS) method. The PK parameters of the two preparations were calculated. Bispectral index (BIS) was measured to calculate the PD parameters of two formulations. Adverse events during the trial were recorded.

Results

Thirty-one volunteers were included in the pharmacokinetic parameter set. The mean values of PK parameters of test andreference formulations were as follows: Cmax were (660.87±110.25) and (683.13±125.75)ng·mL-1; AUC0-t were (473.50±86.03) and (478.40±80.25)h·ng·mL-1; AUC0-∞ were (500.45±96.49) and (507.84±88.00)h·ng·mL-1; tmax were 0.47(0.25,0.53) and 0.50(0.40, 0.54)h; t1/2 were (2.97±1.74) and (3.08±1.82)h. Thirty-one volunteers were included in the bioequivalence set. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ were 92.64%-101.39%, 96.43%-101.00%, 95.67%-100.70%, respectively. The mean values of PD parameters of test and reference formulations were as follows: BISmin were (75.94±13.66) and (74.39±12.32); BISAUC 0-60 min were 5 569.85±182.78 and 5 575.68±166.19; T-BISmin were 23.00 and 29.00 min, respectively. There were no serious adverse events.

Conclusion

Two formulations of propofol injectable emulsion were bioequivalent and both of them exhibited good safety.

propofol injectable  /  pharmacokinetics  /  pharmacodynamics  /  bioequivalence
Shou-fei SUN, Wen-xin LI, Jiang-tao DONG, Jing ZHANG, Yan-jiao YANG, Rui-xia LIU. Bioequivalence study of propofol injectable emulsion in healthy Chinese volunteers[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2025 , 41 (1) : 86 -90 . DOI: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.01.018
Year 2025 volume 41 Issue 1
PDF
0
0
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.01.018
  • Receive Date:2024-07-13
  • Online Date:2026-08-04
  • Published:2025-01-17
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-07-13
Affiliations
    1.Shandong Cisen Fodu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jining 272500, Shandong Province, China
    2.Shandong Institute for Food and Drug Control, Jinan 250101, Shandong Province, China
    3.Cisen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jining 272073, Shandong Province, China
    4.Shandong Nuochen Beitong Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Jining 272073, Shandong Province, China
    5.Henan Zhonghui Hosptial, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zglcylxzz/EN/10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.01.018
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT