收藏切换
Clinical trial of ropivacaine erector spinae plane block combined with TIVA in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients
收藏切换
PDF
Xiao-xiao SONG, You-fa ZHOU, Gang CHEN
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2025, 41(8) : 1062 - 1066
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2025, 41(8): 1062-1066
Clinical and Basic Bridging Research
Clinical trial of ropivacaine erector spinae plane block combined with TIVA in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients
Full
Xiao-xiao SONG, You-fa ZHOU, Gang CHEN
Affiliations
  • Anesthesiology Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Affiliated with Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
Published: 2025-04-28 doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.08.003
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block (ESPB) combined with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

Patients with colorectal cancer were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. Before the general anesthesia induction, treatment group received deep injection of 0.375% ropivacaine solution (25 mL) for local anesthesia in the erector spinae plane. Two groups received anesthesia induction with 0.05 mg·kg-1 midazolam + 0.4 μg·kg-1 sufentanil + 1.5 mg·kg-1 propofol + 0.15 mg·kg-1 cisatracurium, and anesthesia maintenance with 3-4 mg·L-1 propofol + 0.5-1.0 μg·kg-1 sufentanil + 0.05-0.10 mg·kg-1 cisatracurium. The sufentanil dosage, hemodynamics, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scores, interleukin (IL)-6 and cortisol levels and safety were compared between two groups.

Results

Treatment group were enrolled 57 cases, 5 cases dropped out, and 52 cases were finally included in the statistical analysis. Control group were enrolled 55 cases, 3 cases dropped out, and 52 cases were finally included in the statistical analysis. At extubation, heart rates of treatment and control groups were (89.54±5.41) and (101.98±8.58) beat·min-1, mean arterial pressures were (83.60±7.48) and (93.12±7.35) mmHg, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Intraoperative sufentanil dosages of treatment and control groups were (16.35±2.54) and (23.77±3.02) μg, VAS scores at 24 h after operation were (2.98±0.42) and (3.67±0.58) points, IL-6 levels at 24 h after operation were (17.92±2.41) and (28.12±3.81) ng·L-1, cortisol levels at 24 h after operation were (154.88±24.06) and (187.46±27.51) ng·mL-1, respectively; the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Ramsay scores at 1 and 24 h postoperatively showed no statistically significant differences between and within groups (all P>0.05). The adverse drug reactions of treatment group were block site hematoma, nausea and vomiting, while those in control group were nausea and vomiting, hypotension and delirium. The incidences of total adverse drug reactions in the treatment and control groups were 11.54% and 21.15%, without significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ropivacaine ESPB combined with TIVA can help the patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery to maintain stable intraoperative hemodynamics, reduce sufentanil consumption and pain, decrease postoperative inflammatory and stress responses, without increasing the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

ropivacaine injection  /  erector spinae plane block  /  total intravenous anesthesia  /  colorectal cancer  /  safety evaluation
Xiao-xiao SONG, You-fa ZHOU, Gang CHEN. Clinical trial of ropivacaine erector spinae plane block combined with TIVA in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2025 , 41 (8) : 1062 -1066 . DOI: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.08.003
Year 2025 volume 41 Issue 8
PDF
1
0
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.08.003
  • Receive Date:2024-10-13
  • Online Date:2026-08-04
  • Published:2025-04-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-13
Funding
Affiliations
    Anesthesiology Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Affiliated with Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zglcylxzz/EN/10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2025.08.003
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT