收藏切换
Progress in verification and validation of simulations for underwater blast-induced hull structural damage
收藏切换
PDF
Jiaqi XU*, 1, Gaojie CHEN1, Shiping WANG2, Xin LIN2
Chinese Journal of Ship Research | 2026, 21(2) : 301 - 316
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Ship Research | 2026, 21(2): 301-316
Ship Structure and Fittings
Progress in verification and validation of simulations for underwater blast-induced hull structural damage
Full
Jiaqi XU*, 1, Gaojie CHEN1, Shiping WANG2, Xin LIN2
Affiliations
  • 1Unit 91388 of PLA, Dalian 116041, China
  • 2College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
Published: 2026-04-30 doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04324
Outline
收藏切换

In recent years, significant progress has been made in the numerical simulation of underwater explosion-induced hull structural damage. However, the credibility assessment of simulation results remains an urgent issue to address. To provide a systematic reference for future research in this field, this review summarizes the progress in the verification and validation (V&V) of numerical simulations for underwater explosion-induced hull structural damage. First, the basic concepts and guidelines of V&V are introduced, including the V&V guidelines for computational fluid dynamics and computational structural mechanics established by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), as well as the related content of Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) and Accreditation. Second, this review details V&V tests for numerical simulations of underwater explosion-induced hull structural damage, offering a hierarchical summary and categorization of tests, ranging from the single problem layer to the benchmark process layer, subsystem layer, and full system layer. Specific tests cover various aspects, including shock wave dynamics, detonation fluid dynamics, bubble dynamics, strong shock fluid-structure interaction mechanics, and structural elastoplastic mechanics. In addition, the research progress in V&V methods is summarized, including code verification, solution verification, validation tests and their hierarchical levels, uncertainty analysis, validation metrics, and parameter calibration. The application and development of these methods in the numerical simulation of underwater explosion and hull structural damage are elaborated in detail. Finally, future research directions are proposed, such as strengthening the validation of basic-level benchmark models, developing V&V methods tailored to the specific characteristics of underwater explosion and damage mechanics, and exploring error estimation, uncertainty propagation, and quantification analysis methods for system-level models of hull structural damage caused by underwater explosion. Through the above literature review, this study provides a technical reference for the future credibility assessment system of underwater explosion and hull structural damage simulations, as well as for model-based ship life-cycle design.

ship design  /  underwater explosion  /  hull structures  /  structural damage  /  verification & validation (V&V)  /  uncertainty quantification  /  computer simulation  /  modeling & simulation (M&S)
Jiaqi XU, Gaojie CHEN, Shiping WANG, Xin LIN. Progress in verification and validation of simulations for underwater blast-induced hull structural damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2026 , 21 (2) : 301 -316 . DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04324
Year 2026 volume 21 Issue 2
PDF
10
4
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04324
  • Receive Date:2024-12-23
  • Online Date:2026-05-20
  • Published:2026-04-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-12-23
  • Revised:2025-03-22
Affiliations
    1Unit 91388 of PLA, Dalian 116041, China
    2College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgjcyj/EN/10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04324
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT