收藏切换
Carbon reduction potential assessment of typical waste photovoltaic panel recycling technologies under life cycle assessment
收藏切换
Da-ming ZHAO1, Bo MIAO1, Yang WU2, 3, 5, Zhong-qiang WANG2, Tian-ao CUI2, 4, 5, Zhe LIU2, Long-yi LV2, *, Wen-fang GAO2, *
China Environmental Science | 2026, 46(3) : 1736 - 1746
Less
收藏切换
China Environmental Science | 2026, 46(3): 1736-1746
• Carbon Emission Control •
Carbon reduction potential assessment of typical waste photovoltaic panel recycling technologies under life cycle assessment
Full
Da-ming ZHAO1, Bo MIAO1, Yang WU2, 3, 5, Zhong-qiang WANG2, Tian-ao CUI2, 4, 5, Zhe LIU2, Long-yi LV2, *, Wen-fang GAO2, *
Affiliations
  • 1.China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China
  • 2.School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401,China
  • 3.Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
  • 4.Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 5.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Published: 2026-03-20
Outline
收藏切换

The recycling of waste photovoltaic panels is of great significance for environmental protection and the realization of resource recycling. Under the national dual carbon policy, the carbon footprint assessment, evaluation of waste photovoltaic panel recycling and treatment technology have become key issues for the sustainable development of the photovoltaic industry. This paper establishes a carbon footprint evaluation system for the recycling of waste photovoltaic panels. Using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), the environmental impact assessment and carbon footprint analysis are conducted for three typical recycling technologies for waste photovoltaic panels (i.e., the alkaline-acid electrolysis method (PI), the improved reverse electroplating-alkaline-acid method (PII), and the improved salt etching method (PIII)). Through LCA normalization analysis, the environmental impacts of the three processes are typical alkali-acid electrowinning method > improved reverse electroplating-alkali-acid method > improved salt etching method. Sensitivity analysis indicates that PI and PII use relatively small amounts of hydrofluoric acid and acetic acid, resulting in the highest sensitivity. Material flow and carbon flow analysis clearly demonstrated the sources and sinks of material consumption and carbon emissions. The results showed that the chemical waste generation and carbon emissions of PIII were significantly reduced. Further carbon reduction potential analysis explored the improvement space for each process in terms of emissions reduction, concluding that all three processes have high carbon reduction potential under a low-carbon energy scenario, with the improved salt etching method achieving a comprehensive carbon reduction potential of up to 82%. Carbon footprint analysis indicate that the improved salt etching method achieves the best performance (0.83kg CO2eq). This study precisely quantifies the carbon footprint of waste photovoltaic panel recycling technologies and identifies directions for green and low-carbon development, providing reference for government and enterprise decision-making and optimization of waste photovoltaic panel recycling technologies.

waste photovoltaic panels  /  treatment technology  /  carbon footprint  /  life cycle assessment  /  carbon reduction potential
赵大明, 苗博, 武阳, 王忠强, 崔天傲, 刘哲, 吕龙义, 高文芳. 基于全生命周期评价的典型废旧光伏板回收技术降碳潜力研究. 中国环境科学, 2026 , 46 (3) : 1736 -1746 .
Da-ming ZHAO, Bo MIAO, Yang WU, Zhong-qiang WANG, Tian-ao CUI, Zhe LIU, Long-yi LV, Wen-fang GAO. Carbon reduction potential assessment of typical waste photovoltaic panel recycling technologies under life cycle assessment[J]. China Environmental Science, 2026 , 46 (3) : 1736 -1746 .
Year 2026 volume 46 Issue 3
64
15
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2025-08-10
  • Online Date:2026-10-08
  • Published:2026-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-08-10
Funding
Affiliations
    1.China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China
    2.School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401,China
    3.Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    4.Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    5.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zghjkx/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT