收藏切换
Identification of key areas for territorial ecological restoration based on ecological security patterns: A case study of the Huaihe River Basin
收藏切换
Jin-long GUO1, Cheng LI1, *, Jie ZHAO2, Cong LUO1, Zhong-jian MEI1
China Environmental Science | 2025, 45(10) : 5718 - 5731
Less
收藏切换
China Environmental Science | 2025, 45(10): 5718-5731
• Environmental Ecology •
Identification of key areas for territorial ecological restoration based on ecological security patterns: A case study of the Huaihe River Basin
Full
Jin-long GUO1, Cheng LI1, *, Jie ZHAO2, Cong LUO1, Zhong-jian MEI1
Affiliations
  • 1.School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221100, China
  • 2.School of Geography, Mapping and Urban-Rural Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221100, China
Published: 2025-10-20
Outline
收藏切换

This study takes the Huaihe River Basin as the research area, integrates ecosystem service assessment, biodiversity analysis, and landscape connectivity analysis, and identifies ecological sources by combining nature reserves. Eight key resistance factors were selected, including landscape ecological risk, MSPA (Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis) landscape types, vegetation coverage, topographic relief, land use types, night-time light index, distance to rivers, and distance to roads. A comprehensive resistance surface was constructed using the entropy weight method. Based on circuit theory, ecological corridors were built and their grades were determined. Furthermore, key areas for ecological restoration were identified by recognizing ecological pinch points and barrier points. The results showed that a total of 24 ecological sources were identified in the Huaihe River Basin, with a total area of 23,590.30km2, mainly distributed in cities such as Lu'an and Xinyang. There were 41 ecological corridors, among which 19 were key ecological corridors. A total of 781 ecological pinch points and 142 ecological barrier points were identified. The main land use types of ecological pinch points were cultivated land, water areas, and forest land. Xuzhou City had the largest area of ecological pinch points, while Chuzhou City had the largest number of ecological pinch points. The total area of ecological pinch points requiring priority protection and restoration was 405.76km2, and the total area of ecological barrier points was 948.99km2. The Huaihe River Basin presents a spatial pattern of "three cores, four belts, and multiple points". Guided by the principle of prioritizing natural ecology and supplementing with artificial measures, this study proposes scientific protection and restoration strategies for key areas of different land types, aiming to enhance the integrity and connectivity of the ecosystem in the Huaihe River Basin. The findings provide a scientific basis and practical guidance for ecological protection and restoration in the Huaihe River Basin and other river basins.

ecological security patterns  /  ecosystem services  /  circuit theory  /  ecological restoration  /  Huaihe River Basin
郭金龙, 李成, 赵洁, 罗聪, 梅忠建. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别——以淮河流域为例. 中国环境科学, 2025 , 45 (10) : 5718 -5731 .
Jin-long GUO, Cheng LI, Jie ZHAO, Cong LUO, Zhong-jian MEI. Identification of key areas for territorial ecological restoration based on ecological security patterns: A case study of the Huaihe River Basin[J]. China Environmental Science, 2025 , 45 (10) : 5718 -5731 .
Year 2025 volume 45 Issue 10
101
19
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2025-02-25
  • Online Date:2026-10-08
  • Published:2025-10-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-02-25
Funding
Affiliations
    1.School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221100, China
    2.School of Geography, Mapping and Urban-Rural Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221100, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zghjkx/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT