收藏切换
Comparison analysis of methane column concentrations (XCH4) between GOSAT and TROPOMI
收藏切换
PDF
Yu CAO1, 2, Ru-ren LI1, Hui-fang ZHANG2, *, Hui-ya LI3, Jun-jun FANG2, Bao-zhang CHEN2, 4, 5
China Environmental Science | 2025, 45(3) : 1185 - 1197
Less
收藏切换
China Environmental Science | 2025, 45(3): 1185-1197
Air Pollution Control
Comparison analysis of methane column concentrations (XCH4) between GOSAT and TROPOMI
Full
Yu CAO1, 2, Ru-ren LI1, Hui-fang ZHANG2, *, Hui-ya LI3, Jun-jun FANG2, Bao-zhang CHEN2, 4, 5
Affiliations
  • 1.School of Transportation and Geomatics Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China
  • 2.State Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • 3.Shenzhen Ecological Environment Monitoring Center Station of Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518049, China
  • 4.College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 5.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Geographic Information Resources and Development and Utilization, Nanjing 210023, China).
Published: 2025-03-20
Outline
收藏切换

As one of the major greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the spatial distribution characteristics of Methane(CH4)were the main content of climate research. However, differences were observed between the methane column concentration(XCH4)data from multiple satellite sources. A systematic evaluation of these differences was conducted to improve the accuracy of its scientific application. The XCH4 products obtained by the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite(GOSAT)and the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument(TROPOMI)from March 2019 to February 2023 were compared and analyzed, and the Total Carbon Column Observing Network(TCCON)data were used for evaluation. The results showed that the two satellites shared the following common characteristics: XCH4 was higher near the equator and decreased towards the poles, with XCH4 values in the northern hemisphere generally being higher than those in the southern hemisphere; In the interannual variation, the fluctuation range in the southern hemisphere was larger, reaching ±15×10-9; Seasonal variation was characterized by lower values in summer and higher values in winter. The differences were as follows: The data volume of TROPOMI was found to be 1300 times greater than that of GOSAT; The annual average growth rates of GOSAT in North America and Africa(13.08×10-9/a and 13.92×10-9/a)were slightly lower than those of TROPOMI(13.34×10-9/a and 14.12×10-9/a), while the interannual amplitude in South America(16.10×10-9/a)was found to be larger. The XCH4 difference between the two satellites in summer was found to be the largest, with a measurement of -5.00×10-9. Verification and analysis with TCCON data showed that both satellites exhibited high consistency, although errors were also observed. Specifically, the differences between TCCON and GOSAT and TROPOMI were -7.61×10-9(-4.59×10-9 and -4.63×10-9 in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively)and -5.03×10-9(-6.70×10-9 and 0.18×10-9 in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively).

XCH4  /  GOSAT  /  TROPOMI  /  cross-validation  /  remote sensing
Yu CAO, Ru-ren LI, Hui-fang ZHANG, Hui-ya LI, Jun-jun FANG, Bao-zhang CHEN. Comparison analysis of methane column concentrations (XCH4) between GOSAT and TROPOMI[J]. China Environmental Science, 2025 , 45 (3) : 1185 -1197 .
Year 2025 volume 45 Issue 3
PDF
56
29
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2024-08-14
  • Online Date:2026-03-18
  • Published:2025-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-08-14
Funding
Affiliations
    1.School of Transportation and Geomatics Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China
    2.State Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    3.Shenzhen Ecological Environment Monitoring Center Station of Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518049, China
    4.College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    5.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Geographic Information Resources and Development and Utilization, Nanjing 210023, China).
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zghjkx/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT