收藏切换
Construction of an evaluation index system for branches of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association based on the Delphi method
收藏切换
Hang XU1, Chuansheng TIAN2, Xin YOU2, Chongyi WANG1, Guanglin LI2, Wuqi QIU1, 3
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2025, 41(10) : 1203 - 1207
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2025, 41(10): 1203-1207
• Survey and Report •
Construction of an evaluation index system for branches of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association based on the Delphi method
Full
Hang XU1, Chuansheng TIAN2, Xin YOU2, Chongyi WANG1, Guanglin LI2, Wuqi QIU1, 3
Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China
  • 2Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Beijing 100062, China
  • 3Health Management Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Shanghai 200032, China
Published: 2025-10-10 doi: 10.11847/zgggws1147323
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To establish an evaluation index system for branches of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, providing a basis for the management and performance assessment of these branches.

Methods

On the basis of literature research and theoretical analysis, an initial evaluation index system for the branches was constructed. The Delphi method was used to consult 22 experts in two rounds from October to December 2024 and then determine the index system, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to calculate the weights of the indexes.

Results

The positive coefficients of the experts in the two rounds of consultation were 100.00% and 90.91%, respectively, and the authority coefficient was 0.925. The mean scores of the importance of the indexes in the first and second rounds were (4.56 ± 0.28) and (4.59 ± 0.26), respectively. The coordination coefficients in the second round ranged from 0.294 to 0.393 (all P < 0.05), indicating that the expert opinions tended to be consistent. The finally determined index system was composed of 3 first-level indexes, 14 second-level indexes, and 27 third-level indexes, with the comprehensive weights of the third-level indexes ranging from 0.015 9 to 0.157 7.

Conclusions

The index system constructed in this study demonstrates high scientific rigor, reliability, and practical value. It comprehensively reflects the performance of branches of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, providing a scientific basis for their assessment and evaluation. This system will contribute to promoting the high-quality development of China’s disease prevention and control efforts and advancing the Healthy China initiative.

branches  /  assessment and evaluation  /  index system  /  Delphi method  /  Chinese Preventive Medicine Association
许航, 田传胜, 尤鑫, 王重一, 李光琳, 邱五七. 基于德尔菲法的中华预防医学会分支机构考核评价指标体系构建. 中国公共卫生, 2025 , 41 (10) : 1203 -1207 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1147323
Hang XU, Chuansheng TIAN, Xin YOU, Chongyi WANG, Guanglin LI, Wuqi QIU. Construction of an evaluation index system for branches of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association based on the Delphi method[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2025 , 41 (10) : 1203 -1207 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1147323
Year 2025 volume 41 Issue 10
83
36
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11847/zgggws1147323
  • Receive Date:2025-03-07
  • Online Date:2026-10-25
  • Published:2025-10-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-07
  • Revised:2025-07-16
  • Accepted:2025-08-01
Affiliations
    1Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China
    2Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Beijing 100062, China
    3Health Management Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Shanghai 200032, China

Corresponding:

LI Guanglin, E-mail:
QIU Wuqi, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgggws/EN/10.11847/zgggws1147323
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT