收藏切换
Establishment of a quality evaluation index system for field epidemiology training program based on the Delphi method
收藏切换
Junfeng HUO1, Bei YANG1, Huihui LIU2
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2026, 42(9) : 1054 - 1059
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2026, 42(9): 1054-1059
• Special Report—Innovating Health Workforce Development •
Establishment of a quality evaluation index system for field epidemiology training program based on the Delphi method
Full
Junfeng HUO1, Bei YANG1, Huihui LIU2
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Science and Education, Shanxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taiyuan 030032, China
  • 2Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
Published: 2026-09-10 doi: 10.11847/zgggws1149654
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To construct an evaluation index system for the Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) that adapts to the "learning while doing" training model and has a long training cycle, thereby providing a measurement tool for targeted training implementation and improvement of training effectiveness.

Methods

A preliminary quality evaluation index system for the FETP was established through literature review with the Kirkpatrick model and CIPP model as theoretical frameworks. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were conducted among 43 experts engaged in relevant fields. Indexes were screened based on scores for rationality, importance, and operability, and the weight of each index was calculated.

Results

The expert positive coefficient (100.00% vs. 93.02%) and expert authority coefficient (0.886 vs. 0.849) in the second round were higher than those in the first round. The concordance coefficients of rationality, importance, and operability of expert opinions were 0.118, 0.127, and 0.089 in the first round (P < 0.05) and 0.179, 0.189, and 0.163 in the second round (P < 0.01), respectively, indicating good concordance of expert opinions. After screening, the final index system for evaluation of FETP quality consisted of 3 first-level indexes, 8 second-level indexes, and 50 third-level indexes. The coefficients of variation (CV) of the third-level indexes for rationality, importance, and operability were 0.07–0.22, 0.06–0.22, and 0.09–0.20, respectively. The normalized weights of the first-level, second-level, and third-level indexes were within the ranges of 0.319–0.351, 0.101–0.151, and 0.009–0.026, respectively.

Conclusions

The constructed index system for the FETP quality evaluation demonstrates good scientificity and reliability. While balancing training process management and effectiveness evaluation, the system comprehensively considers the importance of training needs, providing measurement contents and quantitative basis for the quality assessment of program implementation.

Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP)  /  quality assessment  /  evaluation index system  /  Delphi method
霍俊锋, 杨蓓, 刘慧慧. 现场流行病学培训项目质量评估指标体系构建:基于德尔菲专家咨询法. 中国公共卫生, 2026 , 42 (9) : 1054 -1059 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1149654
Junfeng HUO, Bei YANG, Huihui LIU. Establishment of a quality evaluation index system for field epidemiology training program based on the Delphi method[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2026 , 42 (9) : 1054 -1059 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1149654
Year 2026 volume 42 Issue 9
90
37
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11847/zgggws1149654
  • Receive Date:2025-12-22
  • Online Date:2026-10-23
  • Published:2026-09-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-22
  • Revised:2026-02-11
  • Accepted:2026-04-05
Affiliations
    1Department of Science and Education, Shanxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taiyuan 030032, China
    2Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China

Corresponding:

YANG Bei, E-mail:
LIU Huihui, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgggws/EN/10.11847/zgggws1149654
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT