收藏切换
Comparison of effectiveness of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score and fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study based on 13 regions in Shandong province
收藏切换
Junyi JI1, Yanxiu LIU2, 3, Boyu LIU4, Yan LIU4, Changqing LU4, Ruyue LIU2, 3, Nan ZHANG4
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2026, 42(6) : 708 - 714
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2026, 42(6): 708-714
• Survey and Report •
Comparison of effectiveness of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score and fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study based on 13 regions in Shandong province
Full
Junyi JI1, Yanxiu LIU2, 3, Boyu LIU4, Yan LIU4, Changqing LU4, Ruyue LIU2, 3, Nan ZHANG4
Affiliations
  • 1School of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261053, China
  • 2Center for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012 China
  • 3NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan 250012 China
  • 4Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Cancer Institute, Shandong Cancer Hospital), Jinan 250117, China
Published: 2026-06-10 doi: 10.11847/zgggws1147002
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) questionnaire and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), used alone and in combination,in population-based colorectal cancer screening, and to provide evidence for precision prevention and population stratification management of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Data were collected from the 2024 Shandong Province colorectal cancer screening program.The study population consisted of 6 259 community residents aged 40–74 years who had lived locally for at least 3 years, recruited from 13 regions using community-based sampling. With pathological examination results as the gold standard, the detection rate of advanced neoplasia and the colonoscopy workload were analyzed for six screening methods: APCS, FIT (50 ng/mL), FIT (100 ng/mL), APCS + FIT (50 ng/mL), APCS + FIT (100 ng/mL), and direct colonoscopy.

Results

APCS, FIT (50 ng/mL), FIT (100 ng/mL), APCS + FIT (50 ng/mL), APCS + FIT (100 ng/mL), and direct colonoscopy showed the detection rates for advanced neoplasia being 10.50%, 46.15%, 41.14%, 57.98%, 52.05%, and 7.35%, the detection rates for colorectal cancer being 1.06%, 10.38%, 15.19%, 15.97%, 21.90%, and 0.72%, and the detection rates for advanced adenoma being 9.44%, 35.77%, 25.95%, 42.02%, 30.14%, and 6.63%, respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia, colorectal cancer, and advanced adenoma differed among the screening methods (all P < 0.001). APCS + FIT (50 ng/mL) yielded the highest detection rates for both advanced neoplasia and advanced adenoma, while APCS + FIT (100 ng/mL) had the highest detection rate for colorectal cancer. Stratified analysis revealed that FIT (50 ng/mL) had the highest detection rates for advanced neoplasia and advanced adenoma in community residents aged 40–54 years. FIT (100 ng/mL) showed the highest detection rate for colorectal cancer among residents aged 40–54 and 55–64 years. APCS + FIT (50 ng/mL) achieved the highest detection rates for advanced neoplasia and advanced adenoma in males, females, and residents aged 55–64 and 65–74 years. APCS + FIT (100 ng/mL) yielded the highest detection rates for colorectal cancer in males, females, and residents aged 65–74 years (all P < 0.001). Using the number of colonoscopies required to detect one lesion as an indicator of colonoscopy workload in population screening. That APCS + FIT (50 ng/mL) required the fewest colonoscopies to detect one case of advanced neoplasia and one case of advanced adenoma, at 1.72 (95%CI: 1.41–2.03) and 2.38 (95%CI: 1.95–2.81), respectively. APCS + FIT (100 ng/mL) required the fewest colonoscopies to detect one case of colorectal cancer, at 4.56 (95%CI: 3.52–5.61).

Conclusions

In regions with limited medical resources, APCS + FIT is recommended to rapidly identify individuals at high risk of colorectal cancer. However, in regions with sufficient medical resources and funding, direct colonoscopy is recommended to achieve more comprehensive and precise lesion detection.

colorectal cancer  /  screening  /  fecal immunochemical test  /  Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score  /  colonoscopy  /  Shandong province
吉君仪, 刘彦秀, 刘博宇, 柳言, 逯常青, 刘儒月, 张楠. 亚太结直肠癌风险评分与粪便免疫化学检测在结直肠癌筛查的效果比较:基于山东省13个地区的横断面调查. 中国公共卫生, 2026 , 42 (6) : 708 -714 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1147002
Junyi JI, Yanxiu LIU, Boyu LIU, Yan LIU, Changqing LU, Ruyue LIU, Nan ZHANG. Comparison of effectiveness of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score and fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study based on 13 regions in Shandong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2026 , 42 (6) : 708 -714 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1147002
Year 2026 volume 42 Issue 6
102
47
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11847/zgggws1147002
  • Receive Date:2025-01-24
  • Online Date:2026-10-23
  • Published:2026-06-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-01-24
  • Revised:2025-12-13
  • Accepted:2026-02-13
Affiliations
    1School of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261053, China
    2Center for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012 China
    3NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan 250012 China
    4Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Cancer Institute, Shandong Cancer Hospital), Jinan 250117, China

Corresponding:

ZHANG Nan, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgggws/EN/10.11847/zgggws1147002
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT