收藏切换
Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination for key populations in keylocations: a systematic review
收藏切换
Yingying GAO1, Mengwei WEN2, Shuying YIN3, Hongli JIANG1
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2025, 41(9) : 1056 - 1061
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Public Health | 2025, 41(9): 1056-1061
• Special Report — Influenza Prevention and Health Protection •
Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination for key populations in keylocations: a systematic review
Full
Yingying GAO1, Mengwei WEN2, Shuying YIN3, Hongli JIANG1
Affiliations
  • 1School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • 2Scientific Research Department, Shanghai Tongren Hospital Shanghai 200335, China
  • 3Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen 518028, China
Published: 2025-09-10 doi: 10.11847/zgggws1146482
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To understand the current status of economic evaluation research on influenza vaccination in key locations, and to provide scientific evidence for residents and policymakers regarding influenza vaccination economics.

Methods

We searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, Web of Science, and PubMed databases to collect relevant Chinese and English literature published between March 12, 1982, and November 5, 2024, on the economic evaluation of influenza vaccination in key locations. We conducted a systematic literature review to analyze the current research status of economic evaluations of influenza vaccines for populations in key locations.

Results

This study included 21 studies, involving eight countries: the United States, Korea, the Netherlands, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Finland, and Thailand. Seven studies focusing on hospitals indicated that influenza vaccination in hospitals is cost-effective. Five studies focusing on childcare facilities and primary/secondary schools showed that influenza vaccination for children in these settings is cost-effective. Three studies focusing on nursing homes demonstrated that influenza vaccination for the elderly in these settings is cost-effective. Of the four studies focusing on workplaces, three indicated that influenza vaccination for healthy employees is cost-effective. Additionally, one study from Thailand focusing on prisons found that influenza vaccination for inmates is cost-effective, while one study from Finland focusing on households found that influenza vaccination for housewives was not cost-effective.

Conclusions

Influenza vaccination in key locations is generally cost-effective. Economic evaluations of influenza vaccination in key locations should be conducted based on national influenza vaccination cost and influenza disease burden data to provide references for relevant decision-making.

influenza  /  vaccination  /  key locations  /  economic evaluation  /  systematic literature review
高莹莹, 温梦薇, 尹述颖, 蒋虹丽. 重点场所人群流感疫苗接种经济学评价系统文献综述. 中国公共卫生, 2025 , 41 (9) : 1056 -1061 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1146482
Yingying GAO, Mengwei WEN, Shuying YIN, Hongli JIANG. Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination for key populations in keylocations: a systematic review[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2025 , 41 (9) : 1056 -1061 . DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1146482
Year 2025 volume 41 Issue 9
77
35
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11847/zgggws1146482
  • Receive Date:2024-11-22
  • Online Date:2026-10-25
  • Published:2025-09-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-11-22
  • Revised:2025-04-23
  • Accepted:2025-07-08
Affiliations
    1School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    2Scientific Research Department, Shanghai Tongren Hospital Shanghai 200335, China
    3Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen 518028, China

Corresponding:

JIANG Hongli, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgggws/EN/10.11847/zgggws1146482
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT