PDF
Full
Outline
In this study, the pharmacodynamic substance basis of the therapeutic activity of different origin sources of the Tibetan medicinal herb Zha xun was evaluated, and the protective effect of the Zha xun, from Habahe county of Altay region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; Gilgit region, Pakistan; Lhozhag county of Lhozhag city, Tibet Autonomous Region; Lhorong county of Chamdo city, Tibet Autonomous Region; and Jiulong county of Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, on 0.2% carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced acute liver injury in ICR mice was evaluated. The results showed that different sources of Zha xun significantly reduced serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the CCl4-induced acute oxidative liver injury model, improved liver histopathological damage. Among them, Zha xun from Habahe County, Altay Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; Gilgit Region, Pakistan; and Lhorong County, Chamdo City, Tibet Autonomous Region significantly reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content in liver tissues (P < 0.05), increased the glutathione (GSH) content (P < 0.01), improved the oxidative stress in liver tissues. The preliminary evaluation of the hepatoprotective activity of Zha xun from different origins was carried out using the model of HepG2 cell injury induced by acetaminophen (APAP). The results showed that Zha xun from different origins could significantly inhibit APAP-induced hepatocellular injury and improve the survival rate of hepatocytes. The present study demonstrated that the different origins of Zha xun had definite hepatoprotective activities in vivo and ex vivo, among which, Zha xun from Lhorong County, Chamdo City, Tibet Autonomous Region, had stronger hepatoprotective activities. The animals used in this experiment and the related dispositions were in accordance with the requirements of animal welfare, and the experiment was approved by the Committee of Laboratory Animal Management and Use of the Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (approval No. 00004024) before the experiment was carried out.
PDF
180
71
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
