PDF
Full
Outline
To establish HPLC fingerprint and determine caffeic acid，isoquercitrin，quercitrin，rosmarinic acid，lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid B in Tournefortia sibirica Linnaeus，and to provide evidence for quality control of Tournefortia sibirica Linnaeus.
The chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 column (250 mm×4.6 mm，5 μm) with gradient elution (0-60 min，9%B→38%B) of 0.2% phosphoric acid(A) and acetonitrile(B) ． The detection wavelength was 330 nm. The column temperature was kept at 40 ℃ and the flow rate was 1.0 mL·min-1. The HPLC fingerprint of all batches of Tournefortia sibirica Linnaeus was established using Similarity Evaluation Software for Chromatographic Fingerprint of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2012 edition) and the common peaks were identified by reference standards. Six constituents in Tournefortia sibirica Linnaeus were quantified.
Eleven common peaks were confirmed，and 6 common peaks were identified by reference standards including caffeic acid，isoquercetin，quercetin，rosmarinic acid，purple oxalic acid，and salvianolic acid B. The similarities of 17 batches samples were 0.931 to 0.996. By the methodology examination，RSDs for the precision test were 1.9%，1.0%，1.4%，0.19%，1.1% and 0.32%，respectively. RSDs for the reproducible test were 3.5%，2.3%，3.3%，0.14%，1.1% and 0.19%，respectively. RSDs for the stability test were 0.80%，1.1%，1.7%，0.52%，0.54% and 0.78%，respectively. Caffeic acid，isoquercitrin，quercitrin，rosmarinic acid，lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid B had good separation and showed good linearity in their respective linear ranges. The average recoveries ranged from 95% to 105%，and the contents (calculated with reference to the dried drug) were between 0.004% to 0.013%，0.030% to 0.259%，0.032% to 0.256%，0.256% to 1.246%，0.018% to 0.072% and 0.062% 0.499%，respectively.
The established HPLC fingerprint and quantification method is stable and reliable，which can provide basis for the quality control of Tournefortia sibirica Linnaeus.
PDF
115
54
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
