收藏切换
Comparative study of different species of Epimedium based on HPLC fingerprint and multi-index assay
收藏切换
PDF
Xin LIU1, Rui-li LIN2, Lin NI2, Ping-shun SONG2, *, Ling-xia YANG2, *
Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis | 2024, 44(9) : 1613 - 1623
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis | 2024, 44(9): 1613-1623
Standard Deliberation
Comparative study of different species of Epimedium based on HPLC fingerprint and multi-index assay
Full
Xin LIU1, Rui-li LIN2, Lin NI2, Ping-shun SONG2, *, Ling-xia YANG2, *
Affiliations
  • 1.Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730030, China
  • 2.National Key Laboratory of Quality Control of Chinese Medicinal Materials and Decoction Pieces, Gansu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Chinese and Tibetan Medicine Inspection and Testing Technology, Gansu Institute of Pharmaceutical Inspection and Control, Lanzhou 730030, China
Published: 2024-09-30 doi: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2023-0419
Outline
收藏切换

Objective: To investigate the source and quality of commercially available Epimedium based on HPLC fingerprint and multi-index assay, so as to provide reference for its quality evaluation and resource development. Methods: Forty batches of commercially available epimedium were collected. Fingerprint analysis and determination of the total flavonoid glycosides were performed by HPLC method. The total flavonoid glycosides were determined by UV method. And the contents of their extracts were determined. Stoichiometric analysis was employed to perform the comprehensive quality evaluation of different medicinal materials of Epimedium. Results: There were 9 different plant sources of Epimedium in the market. The five authentic Epimedium were of good quality, and the local varieties were coarse Epimedium. The contents were high in Epimedium from Hunan, while the contents were low in Epimedium from Qianling and Sichuan. The comprehensive quality ranking of Epimedium indicated that Epimedium Fletchum and Epimedium Fletchum ranked first by the principal component analysis method. The ranking of the same variety varied greatly with different habitats, and the Qianling Epimedium and adulterated Epimedium ranked last. The results of cluster analysis and principal component analysis were basically consistent. The cluster analysis showed distinguishing significance in plant sources, habitats, processing methods and contents. Based on the common pattern of E. brevicornu, a total of 8 common peaks were identified for 9 species of E. Brevicornu, and their similarities ranged from 0.066 to 0.979. Differences were observed among different species. Conclusion: Both the fingerprint similarity and the chemical model of content determination can be used to evaluate the species and quality of Epimedium.

Epimedium  /  fingerprints  /  content determination  /  principal component analysis  /  cluster analysis  /  similarity evaluation  /  quality evaluation
Xin LIU, Rui-li LIN, Lin NI, Ping-shun SONG, Ling-xia YANG. Comparative study of different species of Epimedium based on HPLC fingerprint and multi-index assay[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2024 , 44 (9) : 1613 -1623 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2023-0419
Year 2024 volume 44 Issue 9
PDF
111
53
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2023-0419
  • Online Date:2026-03-17
  • Published:2024-09-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Revised:2024-06-25
Affiliations
    1.Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730030, China
    2.National Key Laboratory of Quality Control of Chinese Medicinal Materials and Decoction Pieces, Gansu Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Chinese and Tibetan Medicine Inspection and Testing Technology, Gansu Institute of Pharmaceutical Inspection and Control, Lanzhou 730030, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ywfxzz/EN/10.16155/j.0254-1793.2023-0419
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT