PDF
Full
Outline
Objective: To study the difference of chemical composition between ancient and modern clinical prescriptions of Baihe Dihuang decoction by multi-component analysis. Methods: The polysaccharide extract of Baihe Dihuang decoction was determined by anthrone-sulfuric acid-ultraviolet spectrophotometer under 580 nm ultraviolet light. Six monosaccharides and oligosaccharides in the ancient and modern Baihe Dihuang decoction were determined by UPLC-CAD. An Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 HILIC-Z (3.0×100 mm, 2.7 μm) column was used. The mobile phase was consisted of A 0.2% ammonia in acetonitrile and 0.2% ammonia in water with gradient elution. The flow rate was 0.8 mL·min-1, the column temperature 35 ℃ and the CAD detector nebulizer temperature was 70 ℃. Data acquisition frequency was 10 Hz and the filter was 1.05 s. The injection volumn was 2 μL. The non-polar components were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by high performance liquid-quadrupole tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q TOF MS/MS) and high performance liquid-phase tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-QQQ MS), respectively. The differential components of ancient and modern Baihe Dihuang Decoction were analyzed and 9 components were determined. Results: The linear relationship of 6 mono-oligosaccharides/polysaccharides and 9 differential components was good (r>0.999). The average recoveries ranged from 97.7% to 104.9% with RSDs≤3.1%. Precision, repeatability and stability met the requirements. The results showed that the conents of all the analytes in ancient and modern Baihe Dihuang decoction were significantly different (P<0.05). Conclusion: The methods used in this experiment are accurate, sensitive, stable and reproducible, which can provide reference for the quality control and pharmacodynamic material basic research of Baihe Dihuang Decoction.
PDF
72
34
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
